From: John Kaberna (jkaberna@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri May 11 2001 - 17:06:33 GMT-3
Could you post your configs when you tried auto-discovery and then after you
changed to PVC's? That would help a lot.
John Kaberna
CCIE #7146
NETCG Inc
www.netcginc.com
(415) 750-3800
Fax: 750-3900
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dean, Justin" <Justin.Dean@nrtinc.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 9:18 AM
Subject: Lab 19 problem/questions
> Has anyone done lab 19 yet? I had some trouble with the ATM/OSPF part. 1st
> problem is that I could only get 1 of the routers to work with the
> pvc-discovery. Just to make sure I am doing it right I created a "pvc 16 0
> 16 ilmi" on ATM2/0, then did "atm ilmi-pvc-discovery subinterface", did a
> "show atm-vc" saw the pvc it discovered, then created a map-list and
mapped
> the remote ip address to the VCD of the discovered pvc, created interface
> ATM2/0.2 multi (to match vcd 2 of the discovered pvc), and applied the
> map-group and ip address. It worked fine on 1 router and did not on the
> other. Any suggestions. I eventually just did a static pvc to make it
work.
> 2nd problem. It says to put both atm routers in ospf without using any
> neighbor statements. The interfaces are Non-Broadcast by default, so I
added
> "ip ospf network p-to-multi" on both routers and I could not get that to
> work. I tried point-to-point and that didnt work. I eventually looked at
the
> answer configs and it shows point to multi, but if you look at the routing
> tables it shows that it never worked....does anyone know if this is
possible
> to make these talk without any neighbor statements on multipoint
interfaces?
> Thanks,
>
> Justin M. Dean, CCNP, CCDP
> Network Engineer
> NRT, Incorporated
> (949)367-3438
> justin.dean@nrtinc.com
> **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:30:39 GMT-3