From: Mannan Venkatesan (venkat_m@xxxxxxx)
Date: Thu May 10 2001 - 16:09:42 GMT-3
Johnny,
Make sense. I was thinking to filter that RIP route getting redistributed
into OSPF on R3. Thought it is always a best practice to filter OSPF routes
that are coming back to OSPF from other routing protocols. But in this
scenario that is the solution. I am going to have some fun with this
scenario tonight.
Thanks
Mannan
----- Original Message -----
From: "Johnny Dedon" <johnny.dedon@exodus.net>
To: "Mannan Venkatesan" <venkat_m@ins.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 2:51 PM
Subject: Re: Fatkid - 501
> Mannan,
> Just looking at the topology and the requirements, I would say that if you
> loose Area2(vlan1) then the routes redistributed into rip by ospf will now
> be used. Rip has higher admin so they won't be used unless there is no
ospf
> route.
>
> Johnny Dedon
> Senior Staff Consultant
> Exodus Professional Services
> johnny.dedon@exodus.net
> www.exodus.net
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mannan Venkatesan" <venkat_m@ins.com>
> To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 1:40 PM
> Subject: Fatkid - 501
>
>
> > Hi,
> > I was looking at this lab and have a question. It says 'Make sure that
all
> > interfaces are still accessible in the event that VLAN1 fails'. Since
> virtual
> > link is configured through Vlan1 (area 2) for area 3, how area 3 is
> accessible
> > in the event that VLAN1 fails? Or is there any other way to do it?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Mannan
> > **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:30:38 GMT-3