From: Zeng Puyang (zbridge98@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun May 06 2001 - 02:36:53 GMT-3
Maybe you can try to use /27 on igrp side and 28/ on the pure rip side. Hope th
is helpful.
Zeng
----- Original Message -----
From: "garry baker" <fallow46@yahoo.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2001 12:42 PM
Subject: redistribution igrp/27 rip/28
> Guys,
>
> I stumbled accross something today when redistributing
> a igrp/27 mask into a rip/28 and vice versa. All i
> have in three routers with the middle doing the
> redistribution. I saw in the archives somebody
> suggested using secondary address' of the mask length
> you are trying to redistribute. i then tried as doyle
> suggests changing the subnet mask on the
> redistributing router ie rta has all /28 masks
> including the interface to the redistributing router,
> if you change the mask on that link at the
> redistributing router to a /27 mask you get your /27
> routes from the igrp into the route table of rip, but
> they appear as /28 routes. this creates reachability
> problems with addresses further down in the network. i
> then tried using tunnels much the same way as using
> secondary addresses and it works fine. from the posts
> of the guys that have got their number using the
> tunnel idea in the lab wuld be just too easy a
> solution, am i missing something here?
>
> Garry
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:30:34 GMT-3