From: Chris Mott (cmott@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Apr 30 2001 - 09:41:51 GMT-3
I'm not sure why you would wish to put this on a non-ABR, since by
definition the stub area assignments are made on ABR's ... otherwise, yes it
would screw things up ... for one, neighbors must agree that a connection is
a stub connection, so all routers "neighbored" with your now-stub router
would need to be defined as such ... as well, now you are limiting, via the
type of stub area that you've defined (stub, NSSA, TS-NSSA, etc), the types
of LSA's that will propagate ... then there's troubleshooting this mess ...
all in all, not a good way to spend a morning in the lab ... use stubs if
they say, otherwise avoid them ... HTH
6 days to San Jose ... I'm feeling ill ... ;)
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Niall El-Assaad
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 6:06 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: OSPF: Does configuring totally stubby on non-ABRs casue any
problems?
Hi,
I know that you only need to configure totally stubby on an ABR, but if you
do it on other routers in the area (non-ABR) does it cause any problems or
is it just over configuration.
cheers,
niall
=======================================================
Niall El-Assaad, Systems Engineer
EMEA-UK Retail Finance North
C i s c o S y s t e m s Mobile: +44 (0)772 088 4650
VMail: +44 (0)208 734 4206
| | Fax: +44 (0)161 864 4508
| |
||| |||
.:|||||:..:|||||:. E-mail: nelassaa@cisco.com
------------------ Web : http://www.cisco.com
Crescent House, Towers Business Park, Wilmslow Road,
Didsbury, Manchester M20 2JE, United Kingdom
========================================================
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:30:02 GMT-3