From: Russell Lusignan (rlusignan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Apr 29 2001 - 19:48:00 GMT-3
Ummm... I spent a few days trying to figure this one out to no avail, as
soon as I post to this list my problem, it works. So, by adding the
"summary-address 170.10.12.0 255.255.255.128" to R1, that subnet now shows
up on R8. Weird. So for anyone reading my previous post about this
problem, don't worry about it :)
Too bad we don't have the ability to post to this list while doing the
actual lab :)
sorry
-Russ
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Russell Lusignan [mailto:rlusignan@birdonawire.com]
> Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2001 5:08 PM
> To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
> Subject: OSPF summar-address into IGRP
>
>
> Hey group,
>
> This topic has been beaten to death, but I haven't be able to
> find anything
> in the archives on what is happening.
>
> OSPF IGRP
> ------------------R1-------------------R8
> 170.10.12.0/28 170.10.20.0/25
>
> I want the /28 to redistribute into IGRP, I know R1 won't advertise it
> because it's not a /25. I have ready many posts about people using a
> summary-address on R1 to summarize the /28 into a /25. This
> does not work
> for me. On R1, if I do "summary-address 170.10.12.0 255.255.255.128"
> shouldn't that be enough to get that /28 into IGRP as a /25?
> This works if
> I place a null0 route on R1 with a /25 manually, and I have
> managed to get a
> default-network to R8, but if these are not permitted on the
> lab, I am not
> sure how else to do it.
>
> I recall reading a post a while back where someone mentioned
> that when you
> create a summary-address in ospf it should automatically
> create a null0
> route to that subnet, I know EIGRP does this, but wasn't
> aware that ospf did
> it. When I do create a summary-address there is no null0
> route created with
> OSPF...
>
> -Russ
> **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:30:01 GMT-3