From: Dan (dp595@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Apr 29 2001 - 00:27:49 GMT-3
While, the 1st part of the question states your concern, the 2nd part tells
you exactly what to do.
It doesn't say anything about explorer frames, therefore I would configure
it for all frames.
You may in fact find that you were expected to configure it for explorer
frames only, but I would protest that because of the wording of the
question.
Dan Pontrelli
Customer Installation Engineer - Verio NYC
CCNP, MCSE, CNA
----- Original Message -----
From: "Umer Khan" <umerkhan@hotmail.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2001 6:43 PM
Subject: DLSw+ Explorer Queue question
> Here is the question:
>
> "You are concerned that broadcast explorer traffic is overrunning Ring 1
> (attached to R1). Configure R1 so it can handle at least 50 frames at a
> time."
>
> I can think of 3 ways that might be possible answers:
>
> 1)
>
> int tok0
> hold-queue 50
>
> 2)
>
> dlsw explorerQ-depth 50
>
> 3)
>
> source-bridge explorerQ-depth 50
>
> Which one would be the right answer to this question?
>
> Method 2 and 3 apply to explorer frames, whereas method 1 applies to all
> frames. Although the first part of the question mentions the word
> "explorer", the second part doesn't. Also, the first part of the question
is
> referring to ring 1, but the second part of the question seems to apply to
> the whole router.
>
> Umer.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:30:00 GMT-3