RE: IPX Addressing Scheme: LAN Interfaces?

From: Daniel C. Young (danyoung99@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Apr 25 2001 - 11:52:42 GMT-3


   
Thanks, Chuck.

Any tips on addressing LAN interfaces? I also had problems on addressing BRI
interfaces for snapshot routing on IPX.

Cheers,

Daniel Young
Sr. Network Engineer
Internet Data Center
SBC Service Inc. - ITO

(949) 221-1928 Office
(714) 350-8945 Cell
ICQ# 109846891

-----Original Message-----
From: Chuck Church [mailto:cchurch@MAGNACOM.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 8:47 PM
To: Daniel C. Young
Subject: RE: IPX Addressing Scheme: LAN Interfaces?

Be careful of using fictitious mac addresses. You don't want to mistakenly
use a broadcast or multicast mac address. Keep the first two octets 0 to be
safe, ex: 0.1.1, 0.2.2.

Chuck

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Daniel C. Young
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 1:07 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: IPX Addressing Scheme: LAN Interfaces?

Folks,

Thank you all for the IPX addressing scheme tips. The suggested "best
practice" method is to keep things simple for the lab in conjunctiong with
the router naming scheme, ie. "ipx routing 1.1.1" for R1 and "ipx routing
2.2.2" for R2 and so on.

My next question is regarding LAN interfaces. Since they still maintain
their original MAC address, should we also change their MAC address via "mac
1.1.1" and "mac 2.2.2". If so, what do you do w/ routers that have more than
one LAN interface?

Many thanks in advance,

Daniel Young
Sr. Network Engineer
Internet Data Center
SBC Service Inc. - ITO

(949) 221-1928 Office
(714) 350-8945 Cell
ICQ# 109846891
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:29:55 GMT-3