From: Erick B. (erickbe@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Apr 20 2001 - 03:56:53 GMT-3
I actually did this to backup frame and it is more
reliable and kicks in right away. A feature I would
use, but if you have a lot of PVCs riding over 1
physical circuit then the overhead may be a issue. I'm
not sure how much overhead each PVC w/EEK consumes
though. Docs say 25 PVCs w/EEK per interface,
sub-interface, etc.
--- "Bratager, Eric, S ()" <ebratager@att.com> wrote:
> The following link has quite a bit of information
> and some examples:
>
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/120newft/120
> t/120t5/frkeep.htm#xtocid228641
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Darren Ward [mailto:dward@pla.net.au]
> Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 10:39 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Frame-Relay End-to-End Keepalives
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> Just wondering if anyone has an example config of
> using frame-relay
> end-to-end keepalives on a pvc to support dial
> backup when the pvc goes
> down?
>
> The CCO docs talk about it doing so but there's no
> configs apart from
> the map-class parameters to use and right now I
> don't have access to a
> spare BRI to try it.....
>
> Darren
> **Please
> read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
> **Please
> read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:29:52 GMT-3