From: Johnny Dedon (johnny.dedon@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Apr 18 2001 - 10:35:55 GMT-3
Huang,
Why not bridge set up dlsw peers between r1 and r2 and bridge between r2 and
r3?
Johnny
----- Original Message -----
From: "Huang HaiBo" <huanghb@mdcl.com.cn>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 3:43 AM
Subject: DLSW questions
> Here is an interesting scenario I got from a practice lab.
>
> e0 s0 s0 s1 s0 e0
> ---[r1]--------------[r2]-----------------[r3]-----
> |
> |e0
> Task 1
> configure such that host at [r2] e0 can access host at [r3] e0. The answer
> is quite obvious.
>
>
> Task 2 (this is the tricky one)
> configure [r1] such that host at [r2] and [r3] can access host at [r1].
> Only ONE peer connection is allowed. Border peer command is not allowed.
>
>
> The initial thot I have is to configure [r2] as border peer and then
> both r1 and r3 will peer with the border peer. But this will
> violate the rules becos no border peer command should be in r1.
>
> Another thot that came across my mind is to configure
> r1 in prosmicuous mode. Then r2 and r3 will peer with r1.
> Doing this will violate the rule again becos there will be 2 peer
connection.
> Note that the question states ONE peer connection NOT one peer command.
> That is to say when u do a sh dlsw peer, there should be only ONE
connection.
>
> Any help would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Huang
> **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:29:48 GMT-3