From: Tariq Sharif (tariq_sharif@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Apr 15 2001 - 18:09:40 GMT-3
Could you please check these configs to see if they will do what we've been
discussing. Also will a "port-list" not be a better solution for the
requirement?
Many thanks & regards.
Tariq Sharif
hostname R_TR
source-bridge ring-group 100
dlsw local-peer peer-id 140.1.11.29
dlsw ring-list 1 rings 100
dlsw remote-peer 1 tcp 140.1.11.9
!
interface Loopback0
ip address 140.1.11.29 255.255.255.252
no ip directed-broadcast
!
interface Serial0
ip address 140.1.8.8 255.255.255.0
no ip directed-broadcast
no ip mroute-cache
no fair-queue
!
interface TokenRing0
mtu 17792
no ip address
no ip directed-broadcast
ring-speed 16
source-bridge 1 1 100
source-bridge spanning
!
interface Virtual-TokenRing99
no ip address
no ip directed-broadcast
ring-speed 16
!
router ospf 1
network 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 area 0
!
end
hostname R_E
source-bridge ring-group 100 <--- Is this waht links it to token ring 0 of
R_TR?
dlsw local-peer peer-id 140.1.11.9
dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 140.1.11.29
dlsw bridge-group 1
!
interface Loopback0
ip address 140.1.11.9 255.255.255.252
no ip directed-broadcast
!
interface Ethernet0/0
ip address 140.1.2.3 255.255.255.192
bridge-group 1
!
router ospf 1
network 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 area 0
!
ip classless
end
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Atif Awan
Sent: 15 April 2001 16:41
To: tariq_sharif@btinternet.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: DLSw+ & Ring-Lists
Yes a ring list will serve you the purspose. Try the dlsw design guide on
the cisco web site.
>From: "Tariq Sharif" <tariq_sharif@btinternet.com>
>Reply-To: "Tariq Sharif" <tariq_sharif@btinternet.com>
>To: "Atif Awan" <atifawan@hotmail.com>, <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: RE: DLSw+ & Ring-Lists
>Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2001 17:34:08 +0100
>
>Atif
>
>Sorry, I DID mix up the router names: here is the Q again:
>
>I'm trying to set-up DLSw+ between 2 routers. R_TR has 2 token ring
>interfaces & connects to R_E over a serial link. R_E has an ethenet
>interface. I want
>R_E to receive traffic from ONLY one of R_TR's token ring interfaces. If I
>place a ring-list on the required token ring interface of R_TR will this
>achieve what I want? Any good references would be appreciated.
>
>Many thanks & regards.
>
>Tariq Sharif
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Atif Awan [mailto:atifawan@hotmail.com]
>Sent: 15 April 2001 16:24
>To: tariq_sharif@btinternet.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: RE: DLSw+ & Ring-Lists
>
>
>
>Well for R1's token to communicate with R1's ethernet you need to configure
>translational bridging. I would suggest that you rephrase your question
>because i think you are mixing up between router names.
>
>
> >From: "Tariq Sharif" <tariq_sharif@btinternet.com>
> >To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>, "Atif Awan" <atifawan@hotmail.com>,
> ><ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> >Subject: RE: DLSw+ & Ring-Lists
> >Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2001 09:21:57 +0100
> >
> >Atif
> >
> >No I meant the other way around (R1's token ring 0 ONLY to allow traffic
>to
> >R1's ethernet LAN). I know that what you said DOES happen I was not sure
>if
> >the sam applies to the other direction.
> >
> >Many thanks & regards.
> >
> >Tariq Sharif
> >
> >
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Atif Awan [mailto:atifawan@hotmail.com]
> >Sent: 15 April 2001 01:13
> >To: tariq_sharif@btinternet.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> >Subject: Re: DLSw+ & Ring-Lists
> >
> >
> >
> >I think you wanted to say that R2 only needs to communicate with one of
>the
> >token interfaces on R1. Yes this can be achieved by defining a ring list
>on
> >R1 :
> >
> >dlsw ring-list 1 rings 1
> >
> >and then apply this ring-list to the remote peer statement for R2 :
> >
> >dlsw remote-peer 1 tcp ip-of-R2
> >
> >
> >Regards
> >Atif Awan
> >
> > >From: "Tariq Sharif" <tariq_sharif@btinternet.com>
> > >Reply-To: "Tariq Sharif" <tariq_sharif@btinternet.com>
> > >To: "Ccielab@Groupstudy. Com" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > >Subject: DLSw+ & Ring-Lists
> > >Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2001 22:37:23 +0100
> > >
> > >I'm trying to set-up DLSw+ between 2 routers. R1 has 2 token ring
> > >interfaces
> > >& connects to R2 over a serial link. R2 has an ethenet interface. I
>want
> >R1
> > >to receive traffic from ONLY one of R2's token ring interfaces. If I
> >place
> > >a ring-list on the required token ring interface of R1 will this
>achieve
> > >what I want? Any good references would be appreciated.
> > >
> > >Many thanks & regards.
> > >
> > >Tariq Sharif
> > >
> > >[GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which
> >had
> > >a name of winmail.dat]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:29:46 GMT-3