From: phoenixchen@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon Apr 16 2001 - 01:10:13 GMT-3
You must place the ring number "1" into the ring list.
>Could you please check these configs to see if they will do what we've been
>discussing. Also will a "port-list" not be a better solution for the
>requirement?
>
>Many thanks & regards.
>
>Tariq Sharif
>
>hostname R_TR
>source-bridge ring-group 100
>dlsw local-peer peer-id 140.1.11.29
>dlsw ring-list 1 rings 100
>dlsw remote-peer 1 tcp 140.1.11.9
>!
>interface Loopback0
> ip address 140.1.11.29 255.255.255.252
> no ip directed-broadcast
>!
>interface Serial0
> ip address 140.1.8.8 255.255.255.0
> no ip directed-broadcast
> no ip mroute-cache
> no fair-queue
>!
>interface TokenRing0
> mtu 17792
> no ip address
> no ip directed-broadcast
> ring-speed 16
> source-bridge 1 1 100
> source-bridge spanning
>!
>interface Virtual-TokenRing99
> no ip address
> no ip directed-broadcast
> ring-speed 16
>!
>router ospf 1
> network 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 area 0
>!
>end
>
>
>hostname R_E
>source-bridge ring-group 100 <--- Is this waht links it to token ring 0 of
>R_TR?
>dlsw local-peer peer-id 140.1.11.9
>dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 140.1.11.29
>dlsw bridge-group 1
>!
>interface Loopback0
> ip address 140.1.11.9 255.255.255.252
> no ip directed-broadcast
>!
>interface Ethernet0/0
> ip address 140.1.2.3 255.255.255.192
> bridge-group 1
>!
>router ospf 1
> network 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 area 0
>!
>ip classless
>end
>
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
>Atif Awan
>Sent: 15 April 2001 16:41
>To: tariq_sharif@btinternet.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: RE: DLSw+ & Ring-Lists
>
>
>Yes a ring list will serve you the purspose. Try the dlsw design guide on
>the cisco web site.
>
>
>>From: "Tariq Sharif" <tariq_sharif@btinternet.com>
>>Reply-To: "Tariq Sharif" <tariq_sharif@btinternet.com>
>>To: "Atif Awan" <atifawan@hotmail.com>, <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>>Subject: RE: DLSw+ & Ring-Lists
>>Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2001 17:34:08 +0100
>>
>>Atif
>>
>>Sorry, I DID mix up the router names: here is the Q again:
>>
>>I'm trying to set-up DLSw+ between 2 routers. R_TR has 2 token ring
>>interfaces & connects to R_E over a serial link. R_E has an ethenet
>>interface. I want
>>R_E to receive traffic from ONLY one of R_TR's token ring interfaces. If I
>>place a ring-list on the required token ring interface of R_TR will this
>>achieve what I want? Any good references would be appreciated.
>>
>>Many thanks & regards.
>>
>>Tariq Sharif
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Atif Awan [mailto:atifawan@hotmail.com]
>>Sent: 15 April 2001 16:24
>>To: tariq_sharif@btinternet.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
>>Subject: RE: DLSw+ & Ring-Lists
>>
>>
>>
>>Well for R1's token to communicate with R1's ethernet you need to configure
>>translational bridging. I would suggest that you rephrase your question
>>because i think you are mixing up between router names.
>>
>>
>> >From: "Tariq Sharif" <tariq_sharif@btinternet.com>
>> >To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>, "Atif Awan" <atifawan@hotmail.com>,
>> ><ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>> >Subject: RE: DLSw+ & Ring-Lists
>> >Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2001 09:21:57 +0100
>> >
>> >Atif
>> >
>> >No I meant the other way around (R1's token ring 0 ONLY to allow traffic
>>to
>> >R1's ethernet LAN). I know that what you said DOES happen I was not sure
>>if
>> >the sam applies to the other direction.
>> >
>> >Many thanks & regards.
>> >
>> >Tariq Sharif
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >-----Original Message-----
>> >From: Atif Awan [mailto:atifawan@hotmail.com]
>> >Sent: 15 April 2001 01:13
>> >To: tariq_sharif@btinternet.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
>> >Subject: Re: DLSw+ & Ring-Lists
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >I think you wanted to say that R2 only needs to communicate with one of
>>the
>> >token interfaces on R1. Yes this can be achieved by defining a ring list
>>on
>> >R1 :
>> >
>> >dlsw ring-list 1 rings 1
>> >
>> >and then apply this ring-list to the remote peer statement for R2 :
>> >
>> >dlsw remote-peer 1 tcp ip-of-R2
>> >
>> >
>> >Regards
>> >Atif Awan
>> >
>> > >From: "Tariq Sharif" <tariq_sharif@btinternet.com>
>> > >Reply-To: "Tariq Sharif" <tariq_sharif@btinternet.com>
>> > >To: "Ccielab@Groupstudy. Com" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>> > >Subject: DLSw+ & Ring-Lists
>> > >Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2001 22:37:23 +0100
>> > >
>> > >I'm trying to set-up DLSw+ between 2 routers. R1 has 2 token ring
>> > >interfaces
>> > >& connects to R2 over a serial link. R2 has an ethenet interface. I
>>want
>> >R1
>> > >to receive traffic from ONLY one of R2's token ring interfaces. If I
>> >place
>> > >a ring-list on the required token ring interface of R1 will this
>>achieve
>> > >what I want? Any good references would be appreciated.
>> > >
>> > >Many thanks & regards.
>> > >
>> > >Tariq Sharif
>> > >
>> > >[GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which
>> >had
>> > >a name of winmail.dat]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:29:46 GMT-3