From: Atif Awan (atifawan@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Apr 15 2001 - 16:41:20 GMT-3
Yes a ring list will serve you the purspose. Try the dlsw design guide on
the cisco web site.
>From: "Tariq Sharif" <tariq_sharif@btinternet.com>
>Reply-To: "Tariq Sharif" <tariq_sharif@btinternet.com>
>To: "Atif Awan" <atifawan@hotmail.com>, <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: RE: DLSw+ & Ring-Lists
>Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2001 17:34:08 +0100
>
>Atif
>
>Sorry, I DID mix up the router names: here is the Q again:
>
>I'm trying to set-up DLSw+ between 2 routers. R_TR has 2 token ring
>interfaces & connects to R_E over a serial link. R_E has an ethenet
>interface. I want
>R_E to receive traffic from ONLY one of R_TR's token ring interfaces. If I
>place a ring-list on the required token ring interface of R_TR will this
>achieve what I want? Any good references would be appreciated.
>
>Many thanks & regards.
>
>Tariq Sharif
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Atif Awan [mailto:atifawan@hotmail.com]
>Sent: 15 April 2001 16:24
>To: tariq_sharif@btinternet.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: RE: DLSw+ & Ring-Lists
>
>
>
>Well for R1's token to communicate with R1's ethernet you need to configure
>translational bridging. I would suggest that you rephrase your question
>because i think you are mixing up between router names.
>
>
> >From: "Tariq Sharif" <tariq_sharif@btinternet.com>
> >To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>, "Atif Awan" <atifawan@hotmail.com>,
> ><ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> >Subject: RE: DLSw+ & Ring-Lists
> >Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2001 09:21:57 +0100
> >
> >Atif
> >
> >No I meant the other way around (R1's token ring 0 ONLY to allow traffic
>to
> >R1's ethernet LAN). I know that what you said DOES happen I was not sure
>if
> >the sam applies to the other direction.
> >
> >Many thanks & regards.
> >
> >Tariq Sharif
> >
> >
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Atif Awan [mailto:atifawan@hotmail.com]
> >Sent: 15 April 2001 01:13
> >To: tariq_sharif@btinternet.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> >Subject: Re: DLSw+ & Ring-Lists
> >
> >
> >
> >I think you wanted to say that R2 only needs to communicate with one of
>the
> >token interfaces on R1. Yes this can be achieved by defining a ring list
>on
> >R1 :
> >
> >dlsw ring-list 1 rings 1
> >
> >and then apply this ring-list to the remote peer statement for R2 :
> >
> >dlsw remote-peer 1 tcp ip-of-R2
> >
> >
> >Regards
> >Atif Awan
> >
> > >From: "Tariq Sharif" <tariq_sharif@btinternet.com>
> > >Reply-To: "Tariq Sharif" <tariq_sharif@btinternet.com>
> > >To: "Ccielab@Groupstudy. Com" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > >Subject: DLSw+ & Ring-Lists
> > >Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2001 22:37:23 +0100
> > >
> > >I'm trying to set-up DLSw+ between 2 routers. R1 has 2 token ring
> > >interfaces
> > >& connects to R2 over a serial link. R2 has an ethenet interface. I
>want
> >R1
> > >to receive traffic from ONLY one of R2's token ring interfaces. If I
> >place
> > >a ring-list on the required token ring interface of R1 will this
>achieve
> > >what I want? Any good references would be appreciated.
> > >
> > >Many thanks & regards.
> > >
> > >Tariq Sharif
> > >
> > >[GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which
> >had
> > >a name of winmail.dat]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:29:46 GMT-3