From: sanjay (ccienxtyear@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Apr 11 2001 - 16:33:59 GMT-3
Dave,
You are right. My mistake (after doing some researching). It should be set
on the local peer and not on the remote peer statement.
thanks,
----- Original Message -----
From: <HENDERSON_DAVE_G@Lilly.com>
To: "sanjay" <ccienxtyear@hotmail.com>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>; <nobody@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 11:47 AM
Subject: Re: DLSW question- Is this the right command
> I've only used it on the local peer which in that case says the router
> won't initiate the connection. I'm trying to figure out in what case I'd
> need it on the remote peer. In the 12.0 doc set 1 section shows it being
> an option of the remote-peer TCP another doesn't show it being an option
> of the remote-peer TCP.
>
>
>
>
> sanjay <ccienxtyear@hotmail.com>
> Sent by: nobody@groupstudy.com
> 04/11/01 01:11 PM
> Please respond to sanjay
>
>
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> cc:
> Subject: DLSW question- Is this the right command
>
> Hi,
>
> does using command "dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 172.17.59.97 passive" allows
> this
> router to ONLY accept dlsw connection and NOT initiate it ??. I am using
> IOS
> 12.0(4). and how can you check if this is actually working. When I do a
> show
> run, it doesn't show the "passive" part of the command. Below is the debug
> from one of the routers.
>
> 1w0d: DLSw: Keepalive Request sent to peer 172.17.59.97(2065))
> 1w0d: DLSw: Keepalive Response from peer 172.17.59.97(2065)
> 1w0d: DLSw: START-TPFSM (peer 172.17.59.97(2065)): event:DLX-KEEPALIVE REQ
> state:CONNECT
> 1w0d: DLSw: dtp_action_q() keepalive request from peer 172.17.59.97(2065)
> 1w0d: DLSw: Keepalive Response sent to peer 172.17.59.97(2065))
> 1w0d: DLSw: END-TPFSM (peer 172.17.59.97(2065)): state:CONNECT->CONNECT
>
>
> thanks,
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:29:44 GMT-3