RE: DLSW question- Is this the right command

From: Elias Aggelidis (eaggel@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Apr 11 2001 - 17:05:03 GMT-3


   
Dear All,

When you are going to use this command
it means that the local peer want try
to activate this link.

It will wait the remote peer to start the connection.

Hope this helps

Regards

****************************************************************
Elias Aggelidis ALGOSYSTEMS SA
Senior Network Engineer 4, Sardeon Str
CCNA, CCNP Nea Smyrni
CVOICE, Security Specialised
PICA Administrator
                                                  Athens 17121
tel: +301-9310281 GREECE
fax: +301-9352873
email: eaggel@algo.com.gr
****************************************************************

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
sanjay
Sent: ?et??t?, 11 ?p?????? 2001 10:34 55
To: HENDERSON_DAVE_G@Lilly.com
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com; nobody@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: DLSW question- Is this the right command

Dave,

You are right. My mistake (after doing some researching). It should be set
on the local peer and not on the remote peer statement.

thanks,

----- Original Message -----
From: <HENDERSON_DAVE_G@Lilly.com>
To: "sanjay" <ccienxtyear@hotmail.com>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>; <nobody@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 11:47 AM
Subject: Re: DLSW question- Is this the right command

> I've only used it on the local peer which in that case says the router
> won't initiate the connection. I'm trying to figure out in what case I'd
> need it on the remote peer. In the 12.0 doc set 1 section shows it being
> an option of the remote-peer TCP another doesn't show it being an option
> of the remote-peer TCP.
>
>
>
>
> sanjay <ccienxtyear@hotmail.com>
> Sent by: nobody@groupstudy.com
> 04/11/01 01:11 PM
> Please respond to sanjay
>
>
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> cc:
> Subject: DLSW question- Is this the right command
>
> Hi,
>
> does using command "dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 172.17.59.97 passive" allows
> this
> router to ONLY accept dlsw connection and NOT initiate it ??. I am using
> IOS
> 12.0(4). and how can you check if this is actually working. When I do a
> show
> run, it doesn't show the "passive" part of the command. Below is the debug
> from one of the routers.
>
> 1w0d: DLSw: Keepalive Request sent to peer 172.17.59.97(2065))
> 1w0d: DLSw: Keepalive Response from peer 172.17.59.97(2065)
> 1w0d: DLSw: START-TPFSM (peer 172.17.59.97(2065)): event:DLX-KEEPALIVE REQ
> state:CONNECT
> 1w0d: DLSw: dtp_action_q() keepalive request from peer 172.17.59.97(2065)
> 1w0d: DLSw: Keepalive Response sent to peer 172.17.59.97(2065))
> 1w0d: DLSw: END-TPFSM (peer 172.17.59.97(2065)): state:CONNECT->CONNECT
>
>
> thanks,



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:29:44 GMT-3