From: Devender Singh (devender.singh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Apr 05 2001 - 00:08:08 GMT-3
I agree with you. I seen this kind of configs at other places on CCO as
well.
Devender Singh
BE(Hons), CCNP
IP Solution Specialist
-----Original Message-----
From: Jiang [mailto:jianggx@transcentury.com.cn]
Sent: Sunday, 25 March 2001 11:19
To: CCIELAB
Subject: Does I really need these commands in the config of IPX Snapshot
routing??
Hello, all,
In CCO "http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/129/21.html",I think there
are some mistakes in the configuration. the dialer-list is the
following:
access-list 901 deny 0 FFFFFFFF 0 FFFFFFFF 457
access-list 901 deny 1 10.0000.0000.0001 0 10.ffff.ffff.ffff 453
access-list 901 deny 4 10.0000.0000.0001 0 10.ffff.ffff.ffff 452
access-list 901 deny 4 FFFFFFFF 0 FFFFFFFF 456
access-list 901 permit 0
access-list 901 permit 1
access-list 901 permit 4
access-list 901 permit 5
access-list 901 permit 17
access-list 901 permit 20
I think they shouldn't deny sap and rip(453 and 452), because one
role of snapshot is handling such thing, they can't trigger the
call even you don't deny them. I tested it in my lab, just deny 457, the
routers worked well. Although the config of the cco can also work, but
I think there shouldn't be added. The questions is if you understand
the concept of snapshot routing. Before I read this config, I think
I understand sanpshot very well, but this config really make me
puzzled.
Do you think my understanding of snapshot routing is right or not? If
I am wrong, pls correct me.
Another question, what is sap 456, should I deny it or not?
Best regards,
Guoxing Jiang mailto:jianggx@transcentury.com.cn
**NOTE** All LAB SWAP messages should now be sent to the
LAB SWAP Message board on groupstudy.com.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:29:40 GMT-3