From: Nigel Taylor (nigel_taylor@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Apr 01 2001 - 13:41:55 GMT-3
Marcus,
Post the configs... for R1 and R2... I must be missing
something... at the same time try the
"area 1 nssa nosummary" command and see if anything changes. The other
command should work as well.
Nigel..
----- Original Message -----
From: Markus Haas <mh@nmc-m.dtag.de>
To: Nigel Taylor <nigel_taylor@hotmail.com>
Cc: CCIELAB <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Sunday, April 01, 2001 11:39 AM
Subject: AW: Redistributing variably subnetted routes from OSPF into RIP
(+default-route)
> Hi Nigel,
>
> R2 is getting the default-route from R1. I configured on R1
> "area 1 nssa default-information-originate" on R1.
> R2 see the default-route from R1 and the "Gateway of
> last resort will set proper. Look:
>
> R2#sh ip route
> .
> .
> Gateway of last resort is 192.168.0.1 to network 0.0.0.0
> .
> .
> 11.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
> O IA 11.11.11.11 [110/65] via 192.168.0.1, 00:19:10, Serial1
> C 192.168.0.0/24 is directly connected, Serial1
> O*N2 0.0.0.0/0 [110/1] via 192.168.0.1, 00:14:28, Serial1
>
>
> On R2 I redistribute the Network 192.168.0.0/24 and 11.11.11.0/24
> into the RIP domain. That's working fine and I see the OSPF routes
> inside the RIP domain. Look:
>
>
> R3#sh ip route
> .
> .
> Gateway of last resort is not set
> .
> .
> R 11.0.0.0/8 [120/10] via 10.1.3.1, 00:00:18, Ethernet0
> R 192.168.0.0/24 [120/1] via 10.1.3.1, 00:00:18, Ethernet0
>
> The problem is that the RIP don't pick the default-route and propagate
> it within RIP. I tried the command "default-information originate" on R2
> under the rip process. But it doen't work.
> Any other idea's ? I will also read Doyle. Maybe he has an answer for me.
>
> Markus
>
> > -----Urspr|ngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: Nigel Taylor [mailto:nigel_taylor@hotmail.com]
> > Gesendet: Sonntag, 1. April 2001 16:37
> > An: Markus Haas; A.Strobel
> > Cc: CCIELAB
> > Betreff: Re: Redistributing variably subnetted routes from OSPF into RIP
> > (+default-route)
> >
> >
> > Marcus,
> > My first question is "how is r2 getting the
default-route
> > from r1 now...? There's actually a couple of ways to get your desired
> > results in this scenario.
> >
> > 1. If all you need is a default-route to propagate into your rip domain
> > then the "area X nssa default-information originate on the NSSA ABR
should
> > get this done.
> > 2. If you have specific requirements to filter IA(type 3&4 LSAs) then
the
> > "area X nssa no-summary" will fulfill this requirement.
> >
> > Check out Doyle's book on page 537-544, there are some great examples
> > there..
> >
> > HTH
> >
> > Nigel..
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Markus Haas <mh@nmc-m.dtag.de>
> > To: A.Strobel <anja10@usa.net>
> > Cc: CCIELAB <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Sunday, April 01, 2001 5:49 AM
> > Subject: AW: Redistributing variably subnetted routes from OSPF into RIP
> > (+default-route)
> >
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have a similar problem too. I'am dealing with
> > > default-routes between OSPP and RIPv1.
> > >
> > > R1--<OSPF>--R2--<RIP>--R3
> > >
> > > R1= NSSA ABR
> > > R2= NSSA ASBR
> > > R3= RIPv1 only
> > >
> > >
> > > My problem is that I want to use the default-route
> > > who's R2 is receiving from R1 inside my RIP domain.
> > > I tried several thing's, but I cant get it running.
> > > Have you an idea how it would work
> > >
> > > Markus
> > >
> > > > -----Urspr|ngliche Nachricht-----
> > > > Von: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]Im
> > Auftrag von
> > > > A.Strobel
> > > > Gesendet: Samstag, 31. Mdrz 2001 13:10
> > > > An: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > > Betreff: Redistributing variably subnetted routes from OSPF into RIP
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Redistributing variably subnetted routes from OSPF into RIP
> > > >
> > > > R3---<OSPF--<<-R2--->>>RIP-->>R1
> > > >
> > > > R2 is the ASBR
> > > >
> > > > I know one way to accomplish this is to summarize the routes and
> > > > use of "IP
> > > > route xxxx null0" on R2.
> > > >
> > > > Correct me if I am wrong, but the other solution is the use of " ip
> > > > default-network xxx " on R1.
> > > > This works and I can reach the VLSM routes of R3 from R1, but
> > something
> > > > strange happens:
> > > > After I enter the command
> > > >
> > > > config t
> > > > ip default-network 10.1.3.0 (10.1.3.0 is on R3, with
> > RIP-compatible
> > > > mask)
> > > > end
> > > > show run
> > > > .
> > > > .
> > > > .
> > > > ip route 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 10.1.3.0
> > > >
> > > > As you see, my "ip default-network" command changes into "ip
> > > > route" command!
> > > >
> > > > Is this behavior normal?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I am puzzled. Any light would be appreciated
> > > >
> > > > A. Strobel
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:29:38 GMT-3