From: Steven Weber (itweber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Mar 04 2001 - 17:38:11 GMT-3
If I'm understanding no sync correctly your only other option is that you
redistribute your entire IGP into BGP, leaving you with a very messy routing
table. I view no sync as a good way of keeping your routes neat. I don't think
that not using it is practical or advised, although I have been told many a tim
e
that it is on by default for a reason.
My $.02
Steve
----- Original Message -----
From: crl
To: Groupstudy
Sent: 3/4/01 3:14:43 PM
Subject: BGP no sync and Bootcamp
Labs
Just finished my first run through Bootcamp Lab #6. Not a very tough
one
anymore if you skip the protocols that are irrelevant to today's lab...
To
shake things up a bit, I decided to try to get the BGP configs all
working
without using the no sync command (I know that it wasn't outlawed in
the
lab.)
Well I had a terrible time of this. I admit, BGP is a weak area for me,
and
I likely won't be doing anymore Bootcamp labs until I polish my BGP
core
knowledge. Has anyone else done these labs leaving syncronization enabled?
I
could get about half my routes into the routing table, but the other half
I
just couldn't.
I know it's been brought up before, but if the odds are that the lab
is
going to outlaw the "no sync" command, why do so many people turn it on
when
doing scenarios?
That's my thought of the day...
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:29:19 GMT-3