From: David FAHED (dfahed@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Mar 03 2001 - 16:57:37 GMT-3
Thanks guy for all your response I will test this next after my Lab ....
Troy Edington wrote:
> I think I understand what you are saying. Not an answer to your exact
> question, but an alternatice. The easiest way to build redundancy is build
> a port channel between the two Catalysts, and trunk on top of that. If you
> lose one of the ports in the channel, the other one will continue to
> function and you then have port level redundancy. The only other way I
> could think of is run spanning tree (ISL trunk) and set cat1 to be root for
> VLAN 2, play with the port costs making your second trunk less favorable
> then the first one for that VLAN. I never tried that, but thats where I
> would look, could be wrong. Feel free to correct me anyone.
>
> Cheers
>
> Troy Edington
>
> 7 days left...
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David FAHED [mailto:dfahed@outremer.com]
> Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2001 8:35 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Catalyst question - off topic
>
> Hi,
>
> How can I prevent to advertise a VLAN on trunk port?
> My problem :
>
> Catalyst 1-------------Trunk 1-----------------catalyst 2
> --------------Trunk2------------------
> I want to filter some VLAN on the trunk 1. For example I don't want VLAN2 go
> on the trunk 1 but go with trunk2. If trunk2 go down I want that trunk1 let
> pass VLAN2.
> I think it is possible but I don't know how.
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:29:19 GMT-3