From: Michael Davis (miked@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Feb 27 2001 - 17:23:51 GMT-3
Your access list :
access-list 1 permit 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0
has a bad mask. If I understand what you are trying to do, it should be:
access-list 1 permit 2.1.1.0 0.0.0.255
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Le" <mmle@sprintparanet.com>
To: "'Steven Weber'" <itweber@earthlink.net>; <CCIELab@groupstudy.com>;
"'Elias Hill'" <Elias.Hill@MicroMenders.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 11:46 AM
Subject: RE: route filters
> The 'advertise-routes' and 'received-routes' commands are only available
if
> you originally set it up as a soft-configuration. This is a cool feature
> that allows you to change the filters on the fly and modify which routes
you
> take in, but it requires additional memory to keep track of the routes
> you've learned.
> To check the metrics, look on your neighboring router instead of the
> advertising router and see if he's learning the routes properly. If not,
try
> to be more specific with your access-list.
>
> Michael
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> Steven Weber
> Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 6:58 AM
> To: CCIELab@groupstudy.com; Elias Hill; Elias Hill
> Subject: RE: route filters
>
>
>
> i try that command but it comes back as 'no such neighbor' , what
> now?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Steve
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> From: Elias Hill
>
> To: Elias Hill ;CCIELab@groupstudy.com ;Steven Weber
>
> Sent: 2/27/01 1:28:55 AM
>
> Subject: RE: route filters
>
>
>
>
>
> The best command that I know of is:
>
>
>
> show ip bgp neighbors [routes | advertised-routes |
>
> received-routes]
>
>
>
> By comparing the results of the "routes", "advertised-routes", and
>
> "received-routes" keywords, you should be able to determine the
>
> functionality of your route-maps.
>
> Hope this helps
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> From: Steven Weber [mailto:itweber@earthlink.net ]
>
> Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 4:00 PM
>
> To: CCIELab@groupstudy.com;
> Elias Hill
>
> Subject: RE: route filterrs
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> so how do I know if my route map is doing its job?
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
>
>
> From: Elias Hill
>
>
>
> To: CCIELab@groupstudy.com
> ;Steven Weber
>
>
>
> Sent: 2/27/01 1:00:50 AM
>
>
>
> Subject: RE: route filters
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Let me know if I am incorrect... the "0 matches" refers to policy
>
> routing
>
>
>
> applications, not route-maps applied to distribution/redistribution.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
>
>
> From: Steven Weber [mailto:itweber@earthlink.net
> ]
>
>
>
> Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 9:32 PM
>
>
>
> To: CCIE GROUP
>
>
>
> Subject: route filters
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I am trying to filter a route from being inserted as well as
>
>
>
> changing the metric on the other routes enclosed is a sh run. I'm trying
to
>
>
>
>
>
>
> filter 2.1.1.1 but not 2.2.1.1 and change its metric along with
>
>
>
> 200.200.200.1 to
>
>
>
> 5 but the show route-map comes up with 0 matches, what am I doing
>
> wrong?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- Steven Weber
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- itweber@earthlink.net
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- EarthLink: It's your Internet.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> hostname r4
>
>
>
> !
>
>
>
> !
>
>
>
> no ip domain-lookup
>
>
>
> !
>
>
>
> interface
>
>
>
> Loopback0
>
>
>
> ip address 10.44.1.1 255.255.0.0
>
>
>
> no logging event
>
>
>
> subif-link-status
>
>
>
> !
>
>
>
> interface Loopback1
>
>
>
> ip address 200.200.200.1
>
>
>
> 255.255.255.0
>
>
>
> no logging event subif-link-status
>
>
>
> !
>
>
>
> interface
>
>
>
> Ethernet0
>
>
>
> ip address 10.4.1.1 255.255.0.0
>
>
>
> no logging event
>
>
>
> subif-link-status
>
>
>
> no keepalive
>
>
>
> !
>
>
>
> interface Serial0
>
>
>
> ip
>
>
>
> address 10.34.1.2 255.255.0.0
>
>
>
> no logging event
>
>
>
> subif-link-status
>
>
>
> !
>
>
>
> interface Serial1
>
>
>
> no ip address
>
>
>
> no
>
>
>
> logging event subif-link-status
>
>
>
> shutdown
>
>
>
> !
>
>
>
> interface
>
>
>
> BRI0
>
>
>
> no ip address
>
>
>
> no logging event
>
>
>
> subif-link-status
>
>
>
> shutdown
>
>
>
> !
>
>
>
> router ospf 1
>
>
>
> network
>
>
>
> 10.34.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 3
>
>
>
> network 10.4.0.0 0.0.255.255 area
>
>
>
> 3
>
>
>
> network 10.44.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 3
>
>
>
> area 3
>
>
>
> stub
>
>
>
> !
>
>
>
> router rip
>
>
>
> network 200.200.200.0
>
>
>
> !
>
>
>
> router bgp
>
>
>
> 1
>
>
>
> no synchronization
>
>
>
> network 10.44.1.1 mask
>
>
>
> 255.255.255.255
>
>
>
> redistribute static
>
>
>
> redistribute
>
>
>
> rip
>
>
>
> neighbor 10.33.1.33 remote-as 2
>
>
>
> neighbor 10.33.1.33
>
>
>
> ebgp-multihop 2
>
>
>
> neighbor 10.33.1.33 update-source
>
>
>
> Loopback0
>
>
>
> neighbor 10.33.1.33 route-map FILTER out
>
>
>
> no
>
>
>
> auto-summary
>
>
>
> !
>
>
>
> no ip classless
>
>
>
> ip route 2.1.1.0 255.255.255.0
>
>
>
> Null0
>
>
>
> ip route 2.2.1.0 255.255.255.0 Null0
>
>
>
> access-list 1 permit 0.0.0.0
>
>
>
> 255.255.255.0
>
>
>
> route-map FILTER permit 10
>
>
>
> match ip address
>
>
>
> 1
>
>
>
> set metric 5
>
>
>
> !
>
>
>
> route-map FILTER deny
>
>
>
> 20
>
>
>
> !
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> !
>
>
>
> line con
>
>
>
> 0
>
>
>
> exec-timeout 0
>
>
>
> 0
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> r4#sh
>
>
>
> rout
>
>
>
> route-map FILTER, permit, sequence 10
>
>
>
> Match
>
>
>
> clauses:
>
>
>
> ip address (access-lists): 1
>
>
>
> Set
>
>
>
> clauses:
>
>
>
> metric 5
>
>
>
> Policy routing matches: 0
>
>
>
> packets, 0 bytes
>
>
>
> route-map FILTER, deny, sequence 20
>
>
>
> Match
>
>
>
> clauses:
>
>
>
> Set clauses:
>
>
>
> Policy routing matches: 0 packets, 0
>
>
>
> bytes
>
>
>
> r4#sh ip rou
>
>
>
> Codes: C - connected, S - static, I - IGRP, R - RIP, M
>
>
>
> - mobile, B - BGP
>
>
>
> D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP
>
>
>
> external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 -
>
>
>
>
>
>
> OSPF NSSA external type 2
>
>
>
> E1 - OSPF
>
>
>
> external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2, E -
>
>
>
> EGP
>
>
>
> i - IS-IS, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 -
>
>
>
>
>
>
> IS-IS level-2, * - candidate default
>
>
>
> U -
>
>
>
> per-user static route, o - ODR
>
>
>
> Gateway of last resort is 10.34.1.1 to network 0.0.0.0
>
>
>
> 2.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 2
>
>
>
> subnets
>
>
>
> S 2.2.1.0 is directly connected,
>
>
>
> Null0
>
>
>
> S 2.1.1.0 is directly connected,
>
>
>
> Null0
>
>
>
> 10.0.0.0/16 is subnetted, 3
>
>
>
> subnets
>
>
>
> C 10.4.0.0 is directly connected,
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Ethernet0
>
>
>
> C 10.44.0.0 is directly
>
>
>
> connected, Loopback0
>
>
>
> C 10.34.0.0 is
>
>
>
> directly connected, Serial0
>
>
>
> B 22.0.0.0/8 [20/0] via
>
>
>
> 10.33.1.33, 01:28:12
>
>
>
> C 200.200.200.0/24 is directly
>
>
>
> connected, Loopback1
>
>
>
> O*IA 0.0.0.0/0 [110/65] via 10.34.1.1, 01:28:18,
>
>
>
> Serial0
>
>
>
> r4#
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:29:08 GMT-3