From: Johnny Dedon (johnny.dedon@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Feb 26 2001 - 21:24:35 GMT-3
Steven,
they should learn about each other from OSPF. R3's loopbacks are in area 33
and R4's loopback would need to be included in OSPF somehow. Adding a
network statement would be sufficient.
Redistributing connected might work also but you wuld need to filter the
other connected routes. You could include it in Rip and redistribute. You
could add a static route on R3 to R4's loopback. Point is that the
loopbacks need to be pingable using each as the source of the ping.
Johnny Dedon
Senior Staff Consultant
Exodus Professional Services
johnny.dedon@exodus.net
www.exodus.net
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steven Weber" <itweber@earthlink.net>
To: "CCIE GROUP" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 6:00 PM
Subject: ccbootcamp lab #4
>
> section 3 task 1 point 1: I've done update-source lo0 on both r3 and
> r4 and have added the ebgp-multihop 2 command. However the lo0 on r3 is
not in
> the totally stubby area that r3 and r4 share so r4 will never see the
route, so
> I tried adding in a default route but that didn't help either, so I tried
adding
> the network statement in bgp and that didn't help either. On r4 the lo0
was not
> part of any routing protocol but I did the same thing on r4 that I did on
r3 and
> nothing worked. There is now no ebgp connection between r3 and r4. Should
I
> add lo0 to ospf on r4 so r3 can learn it like that? How will r4 learn lo0
from
> r3?
>
> Thanks Guys,
>
>
>
> --- Steven Weber
>
> --- itweber@earthlink.net
>
> --- EarthLink: It's your Internet.
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:29:04 GMT-3