From: John Kaberna (jkaberna@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Feb 25 2001 - 22:59:56 GMT-3
If I'm not mistaken 1981-1983 is used for DLSW ports if you are using
priority. Can anyone verify that?
----- Original Message -----
From: Ron <ron@xtranetsolutions.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2001 5:43 PM
Subject: tcp ports for dlsw+ traffic
> Hi, all,
>
> Besides tcp 2065 and tcp 2067, Is there any more ports for dlsw+ =
> traffic? I checked Cisco CD and got no answer. Before I put the =
> access-list 120 in the R2. The dlsw+ is working. If I put the =
> access-list, the dlsw+ peers are lost.
>
> Here is a scenario: R1 (fa0/0) .........(e0, access-list 120 in ) R2 =
> (s1)...........(s1)R3
> Required: only permit dlsw+ traffic pass through R2
> My configs:
> *************
> R1:
> dlsw local-peer peer-id 138.10.4.1
> dlsw remote-peer 0 fst 138.10.25.3=20
> dlsw bridge-group 1
>
> R2:
> interface e0
> ip access-group 120 in
> access-list 120 permit tcp any any eq 2065
> access-list 120 permit tcp any any eq 2067
>
> R3:
> dlsw local-peer peer-id 138.10.25.3
> dlsw remote-peer 0 fst 138.10.4.1
> dlsw bridge-group 1
>
>
> r1#sh dlsw peers
>
> Peers: state pkts_rx pkts_tx type drops ckts TCP =
> uptime
>
> FST 138.10.25.3 DISCONN 0 0 conf 0 - - =
> -
>
> Expected: 0 Next Send: 0 Seq errors: 0
> Total number of connected peers: 0
> Total number of connections: 0
>
> ********************
>
> Thanks for any help,
>
> Ron
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:29:01 GMT-3