RE: IPX addressing - cciebootcamp lab #6

From: Chuck Larrieu (chuck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Feb 24 2001 - 18:13:47 GMT-3


   
Look at the output of your show ipx route

When you enter the command ipx routing you may do so just that way. The IOS
then assigns a router id / mac to the process. Wise people have told me that
one should always use the form you mention - ipx routing x.x.x and use a
scheme that allows you to easily identify your routers, and also easily use
ipx ping.

The network xxxx command is merely placing an address on an interface /
link, similar, but not quite the same as you do for ip.

IPX is a bit easier to deal with than is IP, in that the host address is a
combination of the network address and the station mac address. So you are
letting an interface know its network address. Its mac address remains
constant in most worlds.

Ipx addressing, while not lending itself easily to hierarchy, can be planned
with ease of identity and ease of filtering in mind.

Core = network AA

Distribution = Aaxx, where xx is coded by distribution point or some other
pneumonic

Access = Aaxxyy, where yy is the local network number

So that my ipx network AAC927 might tell me that the route ( or SAP ) is
coming from office 27, through distribution router C9

Does this make sense?

Chuck

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Scott Schneidewind
Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2001 1:11 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: IPX addressing - cciebootcamp lab #6

Hello All.
I am taking a look at, lets say router 3.
Could somebody please let me know where the following numbers came from:

ipx routing "x.x.x"
ipx network "xxxx"

Are these just chosen out of thin air, or have some significance?

Thanks,
Scott



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:28:59 GMT-3