From: Jimmy Dotson (dotsonjl@xxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Feb 22 2001 - 14:31:31 GMT-3
Why not use a route map when you redistribute connected? The IN/OUT command is
always confusing. See below, the Caslow book says the distrib out under eigrp
will block specified routes coming OUT of ospf, not going OUT of eigrp. Confu
sing, huh? I tested this and it worked like the book says. I understand the p
ost is about connected (not mutual), but the point is that the IN/OUT sometimes
gets confusing. Give route maps a try.
router ospf 1
redistrib eigrp 10 subnets
router eigrp 10
redistrib ospf 1 metric ..........
distribute list out ospf 1
Jimmy
>>> "Merrill, James D. (AIT)" <jm8752@sbc.com> 02/22/01 12:14PM >>>
I believe the DISTRIBUTE-LIST 1 OUT should be used since you want to limit
out bound network advertisements. The DISTRIBUTE-LIST 1 IN filters inbound
networks.
James D. Merrill
Systems Engineer
SBC DataComm
-----Original Message-----
From: Dan [mailto:dp595@optonline.net]
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 10:39 AM
To: Rick Burts; Pablo Thoma
Cc: Hebert, Cory J (cory.hebert@wcom.com);
ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: how do I stop connected routes from
being injected?
Yes, you are correct Rick. I believe I asked this question
in an earlier
post (see below):
(from 2/17)...
Ok so to further expand on that, let's say I have the config
below:
interface Ethernet0/0
ip address 192.168.1.17 255.255.255.248
inteface Ethernet0/1
ip address 192.168.1.33 255.255.255.248
If I only want to advertise Ethernet0/0 via EIGRP, but not
Ethernet0/1.
I must filter within the EIGRP process to stop 192.168.1.32
/29 from being
advertised?
EIGRP 1
network 192.168.1.0
distribute-list 1 in
access-list 1 permit 192.168.1.16
Is this correct? Wildcard masks are much easier.
Dan Pontrelli
Customer Installation Engineer - Verio NYC
CCNP, MCSE, CNA
Dan Pontrelli
Customer Installation Engineer - Verio NYC
CCNP, MCSE, CNA
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rick Burts" <burts@mentortech.com>
To: "Pablo Thoma" <pthoma@employees.org>
Cc: "Hebert, Cory J (cory.hebert@wcom.com)"
<cory.hebert-eds@eds.com>;
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 1:08 PM
Subject: Re: how do I stop connected routes from being
injected?
> Passive Interface for EIGRP has a bit of an unusual
behavior.
> For most of the interior routing protocols passive
interface indicates
> not to send advertisements but to continue to listen for
advertisements.
> With EIGRP use of passive interface will prevent sending
of Hello
> messages and therefore will prevent formation of neighbor
relationships
> with any other router on that subnet.
>
> However use of passive interface has no effect on
advertising that subnet
> on active interfaces. The point of the original post was
that he did not
> want the subnet advertised. Passive interface will not
achieve that.
> I do not see a solution other than use of mask on the
network statement
> (a feature in some releases of 12.0) or a distribute list.
>
> Rick
>
> Rick Burts, CCSI CCIE 4615 burts@mentortech.com
> Mentor Technologies 240-568-6500 ext
6652
> 133 National Business Parkway 240-568-6515 fax
> Annapolis Junction, Md 20701
>
> Chesapeake Network Solutions has now become Mentor
Technologies.
> Mentor Technologies is a certified Cisco Training Partner
and also
> a Cisco Professional Services partner.
> We offer most of the Cisco training courses.
> We also offer training in Checkpoint Firewall software and
> Fore Systems (now Marconi) and MicroMuse.
> We also provide network consulting services including
> design, management, and problem solving.
> We have 22 CCIEs on our staff.
> We offer the breakthrough VLAB remote access technology
for
> access to pratice configuration on real equipment.
>
> On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Pablo Thoma wrote:
>
> > try
> >
> > passive-interface
> >
> > for those that you wish not to be included.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Pablo
> >
> > "Hebert, Cory J (cory.hebert@wcom.com)" wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I have simple question for you guys. I have a router
running eigrp,
and all
> > > interfaces on the router have subnets of the same
major classful
network.
> > > Well, obviously, I put the classful network statement
under eigrp.
Well, as
> > > soon as eigrp sees that it has an interface belonging
to the same
classful
> > > network defined under the eigrp process, it injects
the connected
route into
> > > the process.
> > >
> > > I've tried 'no redistribute connected',
'distribute-list x out
connected',
> > > nothing works. Can someone help me to stop this
connected route from
being
> > > injected into eigrp, so that the downstream router
doesn't learn it?
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > Cory
> > >
> > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:28:57 GMT-3