From: Dan (dp595@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Feb 22 2001 - 16:42:56 GMT-3
oops my bad, you're right distribute-list OUT to filter outgoing eigrp
updates
Dan Pontrelli
Customer Installation Engineer - Verio NYC
CCNP, MCSE, CNA
----- Original Message -----
From: "Merrill, James D. (AIT)" <jm8752@sbc.com>
To: "Dan" <dp595@optonline.net>; "Rick Burts" <burts@mentortech.com>; "Pablo
Thoma" <pthoma@employees.org>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 12:14 PM
Subject: RE: how do I stop connected routes from being injected?
> I believe the DISTRIBUTE-LIST 1 OUT should be used since you want to limit
> out bound network advertisements. The DISTRIBUTE-LIST 1 IN filters
inbound
> networks.
>
> James D. Merrill
> Systems Engineer
> SBC DataComm
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan [mailto:dp595@optonline.net]
> Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 10:39 AM
> To: Rick Burts; Pablo Thoma
> Cc: Hebert, Cory J (cory.hebert@wcom.com);
> ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: how do I stop connected routes from
> being injected?
>
> Yes, you are correct Rick. I believe I asked this question
> in an earlier
> post (see below):
>
> (from 2/17)...
>
> Ok so to further expand on that, let's say I have the config
> below:
>
> interface Ethernet0/0
> ip address 192.168.1.17 255.255.255.248
>
> inteface Ethernet0/1
> ip address 192.168.1.33 255.255.255.248
>
> If I only want to advertise Ethernet0/0 via EIGRP, but not
> Ethernet0/1.
>
> I must filter within the EIGRP process to stop 192.168.1.32
> /29 from being
> advertised?
>
> EIGRP 1
> network 192.168.1.0
> distribute-list 1 in
>
>
> access-list 1 permit 192.168.1.16
>
> Is this correct? Wildcard masks are much easier.
>
> Dan Pontrelli
> Customer Installation Engineer - Verio NYC
> CCNP, MCSE, CNA
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Dan Pontrelli
> Customer Installation Engineer - Verio NYC
> CCNP, MCSE, CNA
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Rick Burts" <burts@mentortech.com>
> To: "Pablo Thoma" <pthoma@employees.org>
> Cc: "Hebert, Cory J (cory.hebert@wcom.com)"
> <cory.hebert-eds@eds.com>;
> <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 1:08 PM
> Subject: Re: how do I stop connected routes from being
> injected?
>
>
> > Passive Interface for EIGRP has a bit of an unusual
> behavior.
> > For most of the interior routing protocols passive
> interface indicates
> > not to send advertisements but to continue to listen for
> advertisements.
> > With EIGRP use of passive interface will prevent sending
> of Hello
> > messages and therefore will prevent formation of neighbor
> relationships
> > with any other router on that subnet.
> >
> > However use of passive interface has no effect on
> advertising that subnet
> > on active interfaces. The point of the original post was
> that he did not
> > want the subnet advertised. Passive interface will not
> achieve that.
> > I do not see a solution other than use of mask on the
> network statement
> > (a feature in some releases of 12.0) or a distribute list.
> >
> > Rick
> >
> > Rick Burts, CCSI CCIE 4615 burts@mentortech.com
> > Mentor Technologies 240-568-6500 ext
> 6652
> > 133 National Business Parkway 240-568-6515 fax
> > Annapolis Junction, Md 20701
> >
> > Chesapeake Network Solutions has now become Mentor
> Technologies.
> > Mentor Technologies is a certified Cisco Training Partner
> and also
> > a Cisco Professional Services partner.
> > We offer most of the Cisco training courses.
> > We also offer training in Checkpoint Firewall software and
> > Fore Systems (now Marconi) and MicroMuse.
> > We also provide network consulting services including
> > design, management, and problem solving.
> > We have 22 CCIEs on our staff.
> > We offer the breakthrough VLAB remote access technology
> for
> > access to pratice configuration on real equipment.
> >
> > On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Pablo Thoma wrote:
> >
> > > try
> > >
> > > passive-interface
> > >
> > > for those that you wish not to be included.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > Pablo
> > >
> > > "Hebert, Cory J (cory.hebert@wcom.com)" wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > I have simple question for you guys. I have a router
> running eigrp,
> and all
> > > > interfaces on the router have subnets of the same
> major classful
> network.
> > > > Well, obviously, I put the classful network statement
> under eigrp.
> Well, as
> > > > soon as eigrp sees that it has an interface belonging
> to the same
> classful
> > > > network defined under the eigrp process, it injects
> the connected
> route into
> > > > the process.
> > > >
> > > > I've tried 'no redistribute connected',
> 'distribute-list x out
> connected',
> > > > nothing works. Can someone help me to stop this
> connected route from
> being
> > > > injected into eigrp, so that the downstream router
> doesn't learn it?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks!
> > > >
> > > > Cory
> > > >
> > > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:28:57 GMT-3