Re: Re: SNA and NetBios ACL

From: omoruyi usuanlele (omo_u@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Feb 21 2001 - 13:05:57 GMT-3


   
So you will be 100% sure it is correct, you can refer
to DLSW+ Customization pages.

http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/ibsw/ibdlsw/prodlit/dlsw4_rg.htm

Cheers//
Omoruyi

--- Peter Puczko <ppuczko@excite.com> wrote:
> Honestly I am 90% sure.
> I was told by a guy who was working with mainfarmes
> and NetBIOS a lot that
> 0xf0f0 0x0101 (NetBIOS) and 0x0000 0x0d0d (SNA)
> permits both command and
> response frames (which have saps incremented by
> one).
>
> Peter
>
>
> On Wed, 21 Feb 2001 16:38:59 +0800, jiangyuanshun
> wrote:
>
> > Peter Puczko£¬
> >
> > i see it on the Andrew Bruce Caslow's book ,it
> looks like:
> > 0xf0f0 0x0001
> > is it the same like 0xf0f0 0x0101?
> > does anyone test it?
> > can anyone explain for me why it can't be writen
> like this:
> > 0xf0f0 0x0000
> >
> > ÔÚ 01-2-20 13:01:00 ÄúдµÀ£º
> > >I hope it was a typo, should be:
> > >
> > >0xf0f0 0x0101 ----NetBios
> > >0x0000 0x0d0d ----SNA
> > >
> > >Peter
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >On Tue, 20 Feb 2001 12:55:52 -0800, sanjay
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> 0xf0f0 0x0101 ----SNA
> > >> 0x0000 0x0d0d ----NetBios
> > >> 0x0000 0xffff ----For all other traffic
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> ----- Original Message -----
> > >> From: "Jay Chandradas" <jachandr@cisco.com>
> > >> To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > >> Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 11:16 AM
> > >> Subject: SNA and NetBios ACL
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> > hi,
> > >> >
> > >> > I am a bit confused on ACL for SNA and
> NetBios. I see different
> ACL in
> > >> > different books. Just want to know what I
> use is correct:
> > >> >
> > >> > I use: for permiting SNA : access-list 200
> permit 0x0404 0x0101
> > >> >
> access-list 200 per
> 0x0004
> > >> > 0x0101
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > for permiting NetBios : access-list 201
> per 0xf0f0 0x0101
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > Is this okey.. or do u have to permit any
> other values:
> > >> >
> > >> > Thanks
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > Jay.
> > >> >
> > >> >
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:28:55 GMT-3