From: Peter (peter@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Feb 20 2001 - 18:24:31 GMT-3
Tyler,
You need to figure out how not to confuse "truth" with your opinion. Is it
now a standard axiom that the exam is easy? I have not seen that disclosed
by Cisco. Could you please send me the link?
Peter
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tyler Pomerhn" <tpomerhn@cisco.com>
To: "Lawrence Dwyer, IP Infrastructure" <dwyer@torrentnet.com>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 9:38 AM
Subject: RE: Number of new CCIE's (off topic)
> I would disagree with the generic "cisco@groupstudy.com" being the ONLY
> list for "off topic" posts. Clearly, the CCIE discussion we were having
> falls under the heading of "CCIE only" and not "Cisco in general."
> Nobody going for their CCNP is interested in this thread.
>
> IMNSHO, if we're to get rid of this past discussion, then we should also
> be required to get rid of all "LAB SWAP" messages. I guarantee those
> piss me off way more than anyone is pissed about the truth of mine. With
> every lab swap message, I see another reason not to complain for an
> instant about the supposed "backlog situation."
>
> Also, in going over my inbox, there were over two dozen posts that were
> off topic. I don't see complaints about the "CCIE Design" question or
> others... why not? Is it just because I'm taking an "unpopular" stance?
>
> tp
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Lawrence Dwyer, IP Infrastructure [mailto:dwyer@torrentnet.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 10:38 AM
> > To: Tyler Pomerhn; Hardin Les - SMTP; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: Re: Number of new CCIE's (off topic)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Actually Tyler, I would disagree, this list was intentionally
> > setup for only
> > for people having passed the written to prepare for the
> > technical details of
> > the Lab. The "nonsense" you mention is supposed to be the
> > only traffic on
> > this list, with maybe an exception for lab dates. The generic list
> > (cisco@groupstudy.com) is for the certification related
> > topics, this is now
> > called the professional/technical list. The purpose of the
> > lists is really
> > up to Paul.
> >
> > Larry
> >
> > Tyler Pomerhn wrote:
> >
> > > There's a VERY easy way to not be bothered by these
> > emails... create a
> > > filter. The subject clearly says "Off Topic."
> > >
> > > While this IS a list for lab study, it's also a list for Cisco
> > > Certification-related topics. As the numerous responses to this list
> > > attest, this is a topic of much interest to all concerned,
> > and I find it
> > > to be a refreshing debate in the chaos of "OSPF is keeping
> > my ISDN line
> > > up because I don't have ip ospf demand-circuit" configured"
> > nonsense...
> > >
> > > tp
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> > > Hardin Les - SMTP
> > > Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 2:49 PM
> > > To: Tyler Pomerhn; John A Field
> > > Cc: Mark Lewis; brian@andyandbrian.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > Subject: RE: Number of new CCIE's (off topic)
> > >
> > >
> > > Hey folks,
> > >
> > > No disrespect intended as you all make good, mostly valid,
> > > points, but I
> > > think everyone interested in this subject should write Cisco (or
> your
> > > Congressperson), find a chat room, and go have a good group
> > > chat. The rest
> > > of us would like to discuss technical matters. Thank you.
> > >
> > > Les
> > >
> > >
>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:28:54 GMT-3