From: Hebert, Cory J (cory.hebert@xxxxxxxx) ((cory.hebert@xxxxxxxx))
Date: Tue Feb 20 2001 - 15:42:08 GMT-3
Thanks for the help guys. But, I guess I should have mentioned that I
already have passive-interfaces defined, and that still does not help. I
thought that 'distriblute-list x out conneected' would have done it, but
that didn't help either.
Cory
-----Original Message-----
From: Amyn Naran [mailto:amyn_naran@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 12:14 PM
To: Pablo Thoma; Hebert, Cory J (cory.hebert@wcom.com)
Subject: Re: how do I stop connected routes from being injected?
remember the intent of the passive intf - to NOT advertise but listen.
--- Pablo Thoma <pthoma@employees.org> wrote:
> try
>
> passive-interface
>
> for those that you wish not to be included.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Pablo
>
> "Hebert, Cory J (cory.hebert@wcom.com)" wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have simple question for you guys. I have a router running
> eigrp, and all
> > interfaces on the router have subnets of the same major classful
> network.
> > Well, obviously, I put the classful network statement under eigrp.
> Well, as
> > soon as eigrp sees that it has an interface belonging to the same
> classful
> > network defined under the eigrp process, it injects the connected
> route into
> > the process.
> >
> > I've tried 'no redistribute connected', 'distribute-list x out
> connected',
> > nothing works. Can someone help me to stop this connected route
> from being
> > injected into eigrp, so that the downstream router doesn't learn
> it?
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Cory
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:28:54 GMT-3