From: Lawrence Dwyer, IP Infrastructure (dwyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Feb 20 2001 - 12:38:06 GMT-3
Actually Tyler, I would disagree, this list was intentionally setup for only
for people having passed the written to prepare for the technical details of
the Lab. The "nonsense" you mention is supposed to be the only traffic on
this list, with maybe an exception for lab dates. The generic list
(cisco@groupstudy.com) is for the certification related topics, this is now
called the professional/technical list. The purpose of the lists is really
up to Paul.
Larry
Tyler Pomerhn wrote:
> There's a VERY easy way to not be bothered by these emails... create a
> filter. The subject clearly says "Off Topic."
>
> While this IS a list for lab study, it's also a list for Cisco
> Certification-related topics. As the numerous responses to this list
> attest, this is a topic of much interest to all concerned, and I find it
> to be a refreshing debate in the chaos of "OSPF is keeping my ISDN line
> up because I don't have ip ospf demand-circuit" configured" nonsense...
>
> tp
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> > Hardin Les - SMTP
> > Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 2:49 PM
> > To: Tyler Pomerhn; John A Field
> > Cc: Mark Lewis; brian@andyandbrian.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: RE: Number of new CCIE's (off topic)
> >
> >
> > Hey folks,
> >
> > No disrespect intended as you all make good, mostly valid,
> > points, but I
> > think everyone interested in this subject should write Cisco (or your
> > Congressperson), find a chat room, and go have a good group
> > chat. The rest
> > of us would like to discuss technical matters. Thank you.
> >
> > Les
> >
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:28:53 GMT-3