RE: IPX/RIP...

From: Chuck Larrieu (chuck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Feb 20 2001 - 02:42:55 GMT-3


   
Just did an IPX lab today, and had issues with propagation of networks.

Is it possible you just didn't wait long enough for the routes to propagate?
;->

Then, having lost patience and added ipx eigrp, the routes had time to
disseminate?

Did you do any show ipx route? Before and after eigrp?

chuck

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Frank Jimenez
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2001 9:27 PM
To: Steven Weber; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: IPX/RIP...

You could be running into a split-horizon issue on the Frame-Relay
interfaces. Try debugging the RIP/EIGRP and look closer at how information
is being propagated...
b
Frank Jimenez, CCIE #5738
franjime@cisco.com

At 12:17 AM 02/20/2001 -0500, you wrote:
>I read in Caslows book that when you activate ipx routing by default ipx
>RIP is also activated. After I added the networks to each one of the
>interfaces on frame-relay I did an IPX ping and got back ..... I then
>enabled IPX EIGRP and got !!!!! I order for the rest of the network to
>see each other I had to enable IPX RIP manually and add the networks.
>Why do I have to do this, isn't IPX RIP on by default?
>
>Steve
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:28:53 GMT-3