From: Steven Weber (itweber@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Feb 20 2001 - 09:35:38 GMT-3
I did a show ipx route and it came up as up, up it could be thaat you are right
,
I just didn't give the routes a chance to propogate.
Thanks
Chuck Larrieu wrote:
> Just did an IPX lab today, and had issues with propagation of networks.
>
> Is it possible you just didn't wait long enough for the routes to propagate?
> ;->
>
> Then, having lost patience and added ipx eigrp, the routes had time to
> disseminate?
>
> Did you do any show ipx route? Before and after eigrp?
>
> chuck
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Frank Jimenez
> Sent: Monday, February 19, 2001 9:27 PM
> To: Steven Weber; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: IPX/RIP...
>
> You could be running into a split-horizon issue on the Frame-Relay
> interfaces. Try debugging the RIP/EIGRP and look closer at how information
> is being propagated...
> b
> Frank Jimenez, CCIE #5738
> franjime@cisco.com
>
> At 12:17 AM 02/20/2001 -0500, you wrote:
> >I read in Caslows book that when you activate ipx routing by default ipx
> >RIP is also activated. After I added the networks to each one of the
> >interfaces on frame-relay I did an IPX ping and got back ..... I then
> >enabled IPX EIGRP and got !!!!! I order for the rest of the network to
> >see each other I had to enable IPX RIP manually and add the networks.
> >Why do I have to do this, isn't IPX RIP on by default?
> >
> >Steve
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:28:53 GMT-3