From: Fabricio Aponte (fabricio@xxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Feb 15 2001 - 21:39:30 GMT-3
Steve,
do a debug ip packet on R3 if you are seeing !.!.! You will see that you
are load-balancing and you are sending every other packet to the wrong
place.
fabricio
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Steven Weber
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 6:29 PM
To: mtieast
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: ccbootcamp lab #2...
I'm sorry, I don't understand the only next hop I can put on r2 for the
static
route is to r1 becase this is the only router r2 is attached to. Also, I
don't
know if I did something wrong or not but by redistributing OSPF into EIGRP
with
the subnets command I achieved reachability to s1 on r3 but when I ping s0
on r4
I get a !.!.!
Lastly, are you reffering to the redistribute connected command, I haven't
tried
it but I don't see that in the answers (sorry I peeked ;-) ).
Steve
mtieast wrote:
> Well, it is kind of hard to explain w/o giving the answer but.........
>
> (incidentally, if you do not have a default route already because your not
> using the virtual cc lab then that one static route they allow you could
be
> 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.10.1.2 r3/s0 and it would take care of step 17 and
18
> for R2 only)
>
> however, you need to be able to ping that ethernet off R4 right? So a
static
> route pointing in that direction with the appropriate next hop will do 17.
> As for 18, think about redistribution. Do a redistribute with a ? on R3
and
> see what the options are. You have only one static route and
redistributiong
> that won't do it, you don't have any other routing processes running so
you
> can't redistribute that. What's left that would be appropriate?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steven Weber <itweber@netzero.net>
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Date: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 4:11 PM
> Subject: ccbootcamp lab #2...
>
> >I seem to be having trouble with ccbootcamp lab #2 section 2 task 3
> >points 17-18, if someone could explain it would be much appreciated.
> >Steve
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:28:50 GMT-3