From: Jack Yu (cciecn@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Feb 15 2001 - 19:02:45 GMT-3
If there is a legitimate concern of the impacts of
some IOS commands, would it be nice to document them
seperately or at least mark them as "use with care" or
" should not use on production equipment"?
Please do not tell me all the so-called undocumented
commands are useless.
I think as an educational list, this is where people
should post those undocumented commands.
No body should try to test anything on a crucial
production router, not to mention the undocumented
commands.
Just my 2 cents.
Jack
--- NoOne Important <lm_nguyen@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Instead of making you look like...well I am not
> making judgement here.(an
> educationstopper maybe???)
> Why not be like Mark and try to educate people on
> the list on what commands
> might "crash" your router? And why not try to
> educate people up to the
> capable "level" like yours.
>
>
> >From: "Travis Niedens" <tniedens@cisco.com>
> >Reply-To: "Travis Niedens" <tniedens@cisco.com>
> >To: "Simon Baxter" <Simon.Baxter@au.logical.com>,
> "Mark Lewis"
> ><markl11@hotmail.com>, <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> >Subject: Re: Undocumented IS-IS Commands
> >Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 22:09:27 -0800
> >
> >I am aware of this. I just don't want people to be
> lead astray. Telling
> >people commands and not stating the possible
> ramifications is not wise.
> >Not
> >everyone on this list is up to the "level" I would
> say is capable of
> >understanding the impact. If you get questions such
> as what does the "*"
> >mean in show ip route's output, which we do on
> here, you are not at the
> >level to understand the issues involved with
> undocumented commands. I am
> >not trying to stop education, but at the same time
> I don't want people just
> >punching in commands because they find it on here.
> >
> >Travis
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Simon Baxter" <Simon.Baxter@au.logical.com>
> >To: "Mark Lewis" <markl11@hotmail.com>;
> <tniedens@cisco.com>;
> ><ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> >Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2001 8:18 PM
> >Subject: RE: Undocumented IS-IS Commands
> >
> >
> > > Remember this list is publically available via
> the web site.....
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Mark Lewis [mailto:markl11@hotmail.com]
> > > Sent: Monday, February 12, 2001 11:31 AM
> > > To: tniedens@cisco.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > Subject: Re: Undocumented IS-IS Commands
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > People on this list are proficient enough to
> make their own judgements
> >as
> >to
> > >
> > > the issues you raise.
> > >
> > >
> > > >From: "Travis Niedens" <tniedens@cisco.com>
> > > >To: "Mark Lewis" <markl11@hotmail.com>,
> <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > > >Subject: Re: Undocumented IS-IS Commands
> > > >Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 16:40:39 -0800
> > > >
> > > >Word to the wise.. and even unwise...
> undocumented commands are
> > > >undocumented
> > > >for a reason. They are for people that know
> why they are there and for
> > > >Cisco Engineers to diagnose issues. I know
> there are several of these
> >that
> > > >can end up crashing your router and should
> never we used on production
> > > >equipment; futhermore, they will NOT be on the
> CCIE Lab.
> > > >
> > > >Travis Niedens
> > > >----- Original Message -----
> > > >From: "Mark Lewis" <markl11@hotmail.com>
> > > >To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > > >Sent: Monday, February 12, 2001 12:10 AM
> > > >Subject: Undocumented IS-IS Commands
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > Here are a few undocumented IS-IS commands
> you might like to try
> >out:
> > > > >
> > > > > show isis timers
> > > > >
> > > > > show isis private
> > > > >
> > > > > show isis database private
> > > > >
> > > > > show spf-log detail
> > > > >
> > > > > show isis tree
> > > > >
> > > > > Hope you all find them useful!
> > > > >
> > > > > Mark
> > > > > CCIE#6280 / CCSI#21051
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:28:50 GMT-3