From: Scott Morris (smorris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Feb 11 2001 - 19:08:06 GMT-3
Not the same operating system though, which defeats the purpose for studying
for the lab. :) Otherwise, for normal use, I would definitely agree with
you!
Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Adrian Chew
Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2001 4:50 PM
To: Dan; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Any limitations with Catalyst 2901 as opposed to Cat5000?
Given the marginal price differences I've seen on Ebay - a 2926T/2926F to me
is a better option - its newer than the 2901 and in a much better form
factor. Also equal to Sup II/5225R combo on a Catalyst 5000.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dan" <dp595@optonline.net>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2001 3:14 PM
Subject: Any limitations with Catalyst 2901 as opposed to Cat5000?
> If I need a switch to study for CCIE are there any limitations of buying =
> a Catalyst 2901 as opposed to a Catalyst 5000?
> They have the same OS and I won't need to upgrade.
> Any advice is appreciated. =20
> Thanks.
>
> Dan Pontrelli
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:28:45 GMT-3