Re: ccbootcamp lab #1 AGAIN...

From: Johnny Dedon (johnny.dedon@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Feb 11 2001 - 16:32:11 GMT-3


   
 I see that you do not have the policy route on the serial 1 interface.
Traffic forwarded from rtr4 will not no where to go next. I would also take
out the access-list statement for any any , this is probably causing your
problem because you have local policy routing enabled. If you ping rtr4
interface then local policy says nest hop 10.10.1.1.

HTH
Johnny Dedon
Senior Staff Consultant
Exodus Professional Services
johnny.dedon@exodus.net
www.exodus.net
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steven Weber" <itweber@netzero.net>
To: "Johnny Dedon" <johnny.dedon@exodus.net>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2001 1:08 PM
Subject: Re: ccbootcamp lab #1 AGAIN...

> Here are my configs, see what you can make of them. I'm stumpped
>
>
> !
> hostname r3
> !
> !
> ip subnet-zero
> no ip domain-lookup
> !
> !
> process-max-time 200
> !
> interface Ethernet0
> no ip address
> no ip directed-broadcast
> shutdown
> !
> interface Serial0
> ip address 10.10.1.3 255.255.0.0
> no ip directed-broadcast
> encapsulation frame-relay
> no ip mroute-cache
> ip policy route-map FRAM
> no fair-queue
> cdp enable
> frame-relay map ip 10.10.1.1 301 broadcast
> !
> interface Serial1
> ip address 10.34.1.1 255.255.0.0
> no ip directed-broadcast
> clockrate 64000
> !
> router ospf 1
> network 10.10.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 0
> network 10.34.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 3
> neighbor 10.10.1.1 priority 10
> area 3 virtual-link 10.44.2.1
> !
> ip local policy route-map FRAM
> ip classless
> !
> access-list 100 permit ip any host 10.10.1.5
> access-list 100 permit ip any host 10.10.1.2
> access-list 100 permit ip any any
> route-map FRAM permit 10
> match ip address 100
> set ip next-hop 10.10.1.1
> !
> !r3#sh ip int brie
> Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status
> Protocol
>
> Ethernet0 unassigned YES unset administratively down
down
>
> Serial0 10.10.1.3 YES NVRAM up up
>
> Serial1 10.34.1.1 YES NVRAM up up
>
>
>
>
>
> hostname r4
> !
> !
> no ip domain-lookup
> !
> interface Loopback0
> ip address 10.44.1.1 255.255.255.0
> no logging event subif-link-status
> !
> interface Loopback1
> ip address 10.44.2.1 255.255.255.0
> no logging event subif-link-status
> !
> interface Ethernet0
> ip address 10.4.1.1 255.255.0.0
> no logging event subif-link-status
> no keepalive
> !
> interface Serial0
> ip address 10.34.1.2 255.255.0.0
> no logging event subif-link-status
> !
> interface Serial1
> no ip address
> no logging event subif-link-status
> !
> interface BRI0
> no ip address
> no logging event subif-link-status
> shutdown
> !
> router ospf 1
> network 10.34.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 3
> network 10.4.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 3
> network 10.44.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 44
> network 10.44.2.0 0.0.0.255 area 44
> area 3 virtual-link 10.34.1.1
> area 44 range 10.44.0.0 255.255.0.0
>
> r4#s ip int brie
> Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status
> Protocol
>
> BRI0 unassigned YES unset administratively down
down
>
> BRI0:1 unassigned YES unset administratively down
down
>
> BRI0:2 unassigned YES unset administratively down
down
>
> Ethernet0 10.4.1.1 YES NVRAM up up
>
> Loopback0 10.44.1.1 YES NVRAM up up
>
> Loopback1 10.44.2.1 YES NVRAM up up
>
> Serial0 10.34.1.2 YES NVRAM up up
>
> Serial1 unassigned YES unset down
down
>
> r4#
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Johnny Dedon wrote:
>
> > Steve,
> > Post your configs for r3 and r4. There is not reason r3 should not be
able
> > to ping r4's serial.
> > Check cabling and clocking.
> >
> > Johnny Dedon
> > Senior Staff Consultant
> > Exodus Professional Services
> > johnny.dedon@exodus.net
> > www.exodus.net
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Steven Weber" <itweber@netzero.net>
> > To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2001 10:13 AM
> > Subject: ccbootcamp lab #1 AGAIN...
> >
> > > I seem to have full connectivity throughout the network except for r4.
> > > All of r4's routes are in everybody's routing table but nobody can
reach
> > > it. Even r3 cannot ping the directly connected serial interface. Do I
> > > need policy routing here also?
> > > Can someone please shed some light ?
> > > Steve
> > >



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:28:45 GMT-3