From: Steven Weber (itweber@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Feb 11 2001 - 02:01:29 GMT-3
I redistributed the default route on r2 into the ethernet segment but I'm not
quite sure what I have done/accomplished.
Can someone please exlpain this one to me.
Steve
Mark Stover wrote:
> Do a show ip ospf interface on each router and make sure that they have OSPF
> configured on them.
> Mark
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steven Weber [mailto:itweber@netzero.net]
> Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2001 10:59 PM
> To: Mark Stover
> Subject: Re: ccbootcamp lab#1...
>
> For some reason the e0 in r2 and the lo0 and l01 on r4 aren't showing up
> anywhere else in the network butn the e0's on r5 and r1 are. Any
> suggestions.
> Steve
>
> Mark Stover wrote:
>
> > It's used to enable the application of policy routing to traffic that
> > originates from the router. Policy routing normally only applies to
> traffic
> > that transits the router.
> >
> > Mark
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Steven Weber [mailto:itweber@netzero.net]
> > Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2001 10:15 PM
> > To: Mark Stover
> > Cc: bruce@williamsnetworking.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: Re: ccbootcamp lab#1...
> >
> > Thanks Mark,
> > I reviewed the answers and noticed that I left out the ip local policy
> > route-map
> > FRAM in my config. I've never come accross this before what is this
> command
> > used
> > for?
> > Thanks Again, I'll be able to sleep tonight (maybe : ) )!!
> > Steve
> >
> > Mark Stover wrote:
> >
> > > Did you enable policy routing? There are two places that you have to
> "turn
> > > it on" You need to identify which traffic flows should have policy
> routing
> > > applied to them.
> > >
> > > Mark
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> > > Steven Weber
> > > Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2001 9:30 PM
> > > To: bruce@williamsnetworking.com
> > > Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > Subject: Re: ccbootcamp lab#1...
> > >
> > > what about the poll interval and hello interval commands? I don't know
> > why,
> > > but
> > > I still cant get this thing to work. When I do a sh route-map I get 0
> > > matches.
> > > access-list 100 permit ip any host 10.10.1.5
> > > access-list 100 permit ip any host 10.10.1.2
> > > route-map FRAM permit 10
> > > match ip address 100
> > > set ip next-hop 10.10.1.1
> > >
> > > I can't seem to figure it out.
> > > Thanks for the help,
> > > Steve
> > >
> > > Bruce Williams wrote:
> > >
> > > > The frame-relay map statements that they use are only from each
> > individual
> > > > spoke to the hub. That establishes spoke to hub connectivity, but not
> > > spoke
> > > > to spoke connectivity. You have to use a route-map for that instead of
> a
> > > > frame-relay map statement.
> > > >
> > > > You could also have use inverse-arp for the hub to spoke connectivity
> > > > instead of the map statement, but I assume they want you to become
> > > familiar
> > > > with map statements.
> > > > I also assume that the LMI type of ansi is just to use something other
> > > than
> > > > the default for the sake of practice.
> > > >
> > > > Bruce Williams
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Steven Weber [mailto:itweber@netzero.net]
> > > > Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2001 8:41 PM
> > > > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > > Subject: ccbootcamp lab#1...
> > > >
> > > > I was looking through the answers to lab#1 and I noticed a few things:
> > > > (1) the spoke routers have frame-relay map statements on them. Isn't
> the
> > > > point not to have frame relay map statements on the spoke routers. (2)
> > > > that they used the poll-interval and hello interval commands. Are
> those
> > > > commands necessary in order to get the lab to work, if so why? (3) the
> > > > lmi-type is ansi and not cisco is it necessary to change it or can it
> be
> > > > left at its default.
> > > > Can someone please shed some light?
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Steve
> > > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:28:45 GMT-3