From: Troy Rader (troy@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Feb 09 2001 - 13:39:48 GMT-3
One more item. In experimenting, just adding "version 2" to RIP on both
sides seems to resolve this, but I know that may not be what "they" want
as a solution. Now even more suspicious of classfull issue, but unsure of
"correct" solution.
Troy
On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, Troy Rader wrote:
> Hi everyone.
>
> I'm working on fatkid #501. My problem is with the connected network
> between R4 and R1. R3 is learning of this network via OSPF, and when I
> shutdown the eth0 on R4, R3 is is NOT learning about this same network via
> RIP, as I expected. I have redist conn under rip on R4. I tried a static
> of this connected network to null0 254 and redist static. I have my
> metric 1 set for each redist attempt. I've tried the rip redist conn and
> redist static with the metric on that line, and I've put the
> default-metric on it's own line. I can see the route appear with OSPF
> before I shutdown eth0 on R4 with debug ip routing, and I can see it get
> deleted when I shut eth0 on R4. R5 is learning about 192.19.15.0 via RIP,
> with R4 eth0 up or down, so I think RIP is working. I am leaning toward
> some issue with the classfullness of RIP and the 170.10 network vs 192.19
> network, but I don't have any answers.
>
> Any and all comments appreciated.
>
> Troy
>
> ps - I don't know why my email client posts with TO: where my name should
> be. I use PINE and Outlook Express and get the same result.
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:28:43 GMT-3