From: zhuqingliu (zql@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Feb 09 2001 - 08:58:12 GMT-3
Sorry, The reason LAM not works properbly is my router configured with irb.
No mater if you configure bridge under interface or not, The LAM works.
Regards,
Perry
----- Original Message -----
From: Perry Zhu <zql@liming.com>
To: Patrick Bikar <pbikar@cisco.com>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 7:46 PM
Subject: Re: Local area mobility w/o bridge group
> In fact, I find that if you enable bridge under the interface, LAM will not w
ork properbly.
> Am I right?
>
> regards,
> Perry Zhu
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Patrick Bikar <pbikar@cisco.com>
> To: zhuqingliu <zql@liming.com>
> Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 6:39 PM
> Subject: Re: Local area mobility w/o bridge group
>
>
> > Hi Perry,
> >
> > It is not required to configure bridge-group to have LAM working : the doc
> > CD is misleading for this.
> >
> > Check out :
> > http://www.mentortech.com/learn/welcher/papers/mobileip.html
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Patrick.
> >
> >
> > At 14:14 09/02/2001 +0800, zhuqingliu wrote:
> > >Hi,
> > >
> > > According to the cisco CD, Local area mobility configuration need the
> > > following step:
> > > 1. enable proxy arp (default enabled)
> > > 2. enable ip mobile arp
> > > 3. redistirbute mobile host route in an routing protocol
> > > 4. enable bridge under interface
> > >!**********************************
> > >bridge 1 protocol ieee
> > >access-list 10 permit 192.100.100.55
> > >interface ethernet 0
> > > ip mobile arp access-group 10
> > > bridge-group 1
> > >router eigrp 100
> > > redistribute mobile metric 10 2000 255 1 1500
> > >!************************************
> > >
> > > But in my lab, w/o the "bridge-group 1" command LAM works correctly.
> > > Am I missing something?
> > >
> > >Best regards
> > >Perry.Zhu
> > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:28:43 GMT-3