From: zhuqingliu (zql@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Feb 09 2001 - 08:46:41 GMT-3
In fact, I find that if you enable bridge under the interface, LAM will not wor
k properbly.
Am I right?
regards,
Perry Zhu
----- Original Message -----
From: Patrick Bikar <pbikar@cisco.com>
To: zhuqingliu <zql@liming.com>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 6:39 PM
Subject: Re: Local area mobility w/o bridge group
> Hi Perry,
>
> It is not required to configure bridge-group to have LAM working : the doc
> CD is misleading for this.
>
> Check out :
> http://www.mentortech.com/learn/welcher/papers/mobileip.html
>
> Cheers,
> Patrick.
>
>
> At 14:14 09/02/2001 +0800, zhuqingliu wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> > According to the cisco CD, Local area mobility configuration need the
> > following step:
> > 1. enable proxy arp (default enabled)
> > 2. enable ip mobile arp
> > 3. redistirbute mobile host route in an routing protocol
> > 4. enable bridge under interface
> >!**********************************
> >bridge 1 protocol ieee
> >access-list 10 permit 192.100.100.55
> >interface ethernet 0
> > ip mobile arp access-group 10
> > bridge-group 1
> >router eigrp 100
> > redistribute mobile metric 10 2000 255 1 1500
> >!************************************
> >
> > But in my lab, w/o the "bridge-group 1" command LAM works correctly.
> > Am I missing something?
> >
> >Best regards
> >Perry.Zhu
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:28:43 GMT-3