From: Simon Baxter (Simon.Baxter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Feb 07 2001 - 21:37:24 GMT-3
Thanks.
I understand the technical aspect, I was really discussing semantics.
by the way, it's only some versions of IOS that will let you define a VLSM
boundary on EIGRP ::
R8#sh ver
Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software
IOS (tm) 7200 Software (C7200-JO3S56I-M), Version 12.1(1)E, EARLY DEPLOYMENT
REL
EASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
Copyright (c) 1986-2000 by cisco Systems, Inc.
Compiled Thu 23-Mar-00 23:12 by kpma
Image text-base: 0x60008900, data-base: 0x61604000
Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z.
R8(config)#router ei 10
R8(config-router)#netw 172.168.12.0 ?
A.B.C.D EIGRP wild card bits
<cr>
R1#sh ver
Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software
IOS (tm) 2500 Software (C2500-DOS-L), Version 12.0(15), RELEASE SOFTWARE
(fc1)
Copyright (c) 1986-2000 by cisco Systems, Inc.
Compiled Wed 27-Dec-00 23:14 by linda
Image text-base: 0x0304ABE4, data-base: 0x00001000
R1#c
Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z.
R1(config)#router ei 10
R1(config-router)#netw 172.168.5.0 ?
<cr>
R5#sh ver
Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software
IOS (tm) 2500 Software (C2500-JOS56I-L), Version 12.0(7)T, RELEASE SOFTWARE
(fc
2)
R5#c
Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z.
R5(config)#router ei 10
R5(config-router)#netw 172.168.1.0 ?
A.B.C.D EIGRP wild card bits
<cr>
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim(thrupoint) [mailto:jgrina@thrupoint.net]
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 7:05 AM
To: CCIE Group Study (E-mail)
Subject: Re: Passive interface questions
Simon,
IGPs, such as EIGRP are activated on an interface basis. With EIGRP as a
VLSM IGP, each network command under the router eigrp {proc number},
introduces an interface into the routing protocol, even if the interfaces
overlap in a classful environment, they do not enter the routing protocol
unless they are specifically enabled by a network statement or a
redistribute connected statement.
This does not mean that on the local router, they will/will not be part of
the local routing table. It means that the route through that interface
will/will not be distributed by the routing protocol. For example:
int to 0, ip add 192.168.1.17/28
int eth 0, ip add 192.168.1.9/28
router eigrp 10
network 192.168.1.0/28
EIGRP will advertise the using ethernet, not the choken ring. If auto
summary is on, EIGRP will also advertise 192.168.1.0/24
Both will show as connected routes in the local router. Routers with the
same EIGRP proc on the ethernet network will see a route to 192.168.1.0/28
with or without a summary route to 192.168.1.0/24
Jim
----- Original Message -----
From: "Simon Baxter" <Simon.Baxter@au.logical.com>
To: "Greg Ferro" <gferro@netstarnetworks.com>; "CCIE Group Study (E-mail)"
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2001 5:12 PM
Subject: Passive interface questions
> Can anyone clarify the requirements when a question is worded :
>
> "Configure eigrp on the serial link between R1 and R2. Make sure
> token-ring0 is not included in eigrp"
>
> If the serial link network address falls in the same class boundary as the
> token, the token network will still advertised even if there's an
> appropriate passive-interface.
>
>
> Is the question asking you not to send eigrp updates down the link?
>
> Or is is asking you to do a distribute-list out (or similar) to exclude
the
> token ring network???
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:28:41 GMT-3