Re: where to apply dlsw port-lists (doc's lacking)

From: Jarrod Mills (jarrod.mills@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Feb 07 2001 - 19:32:53 GMT-3


   
I hope by all ports you mean all interfaces on the router and not TCP ports?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Foltz" <globalfx@netropolis.net>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2001 4:07 PM
Subject: Re: where to apply dlsw port-lists (doc's lacking)

> Also, when you do
> dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 150.150.10.3
> the '0' specifies all ports
>
> Richard Foltz, CCNP-Voice, CCNP, CCDP, MCSE+I, Network+, A+
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <jpritcha@csc.com>
> To: "Brian Hescock" <bhescock@cisco.com>
> Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2001 10:08 PM
> Subject: Re: where to apply dlsw port-lists (doc's lacking)
>
>
> > Router-A has two dlsw remote peers (150.150.10.3, 150.150.10.2) and
three
> > token ring interfaces:
> >
> > Router-A"
> > !
> > .
> > source-bridge ring-group 100
> > dlsw local-peer peer-id 150.150.10.1
> > dlsw remote-peer 1 tcp 150.150.10.3 (the '1' references dlsw port-list
1)
> > dlsw remote-peer 2 tcp 150.150.10.2 (the '2' references dlsw port-list
2)
> > !
> > .
> > dlsw port-list 1 port tokenring0 tokenring1
> > dlsw port-list 2 port tokenring2
> >
> > Explorers originating on a ring supported by 150.150.10.3 will be
> > propagated out tok0 and tok1 by Router-A but not out tok2.
> >
> > Jim
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Please respond to Brian Hescock <bhescock@cisco.com>
> >
> > Sent by: nobody@groupstudy.com
> >
> >
> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > cc:
> >
> > Subject: where to apply dlsw port-lists (doc's lacking)
> >
> >
> > You guys are probably sick of me by now... ;-)
> >
> > >From the docs: "You can create a port list of local ports and apply
the
> > list to remote peer definitions."
> >
> > I have yet to find where to apply port-lists in the dlsw remote-peer
> > command as indicated. The only thing I can think of is in the absence
of
> > a ring-list it uses the port-list instead (even though the command
> > clearly states ring-list, not port-list). Or am I just missing the
> > command that's right in front of my eyes? (not the port-list command but
> > where to apply the port-list in the dlsw remote-peer command). Thx,
> >
> > B.
> >



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:28:41 GMT-3