From: John Kaberna (jkaberna@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Feb 07 2001 - 17:03:42 GMT-3
Typically people will use ip default-network from ospf to igrp. Since igrp
does not understand subnets you don't have too many options. Do you have
a specific scenario you are working on? If so, send it over.
John
-- Original Message --
>John,
>
>What is my option to get this route to IGRP if the I am asked to
>redisstribute one way only. How would you do it.
>
>Another I figured out was create summary address under ospf and red the
>connected subnet. Any tricks how to do it?
>
>Sandy
>-----Original Message-----
>From: John Kaberna
>To: Jim(thrupoint); ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Sent: 2/7/2001 11:26 AM
>Subject: Re: ip route xxxx null0 OSPF IGRP red.
>
>Just for clarification you cannot use any static or default routes in
>the
>lab unless the instructions for that section explicitly tell you to do
>so.
>
>
>John
>
>-- Original Message --
>
>>Sandy,
>>
>>Yes, ip route x.x.x.x y.y.y.y null0 is a static route.
>>
>>Can you use this on the CCIE lab exam, maybe. Does it best fit the
>>instructions of the challenge you have been presented with? If, yes,
>then
>>yes, you can use it. The lab has two objectives, one to exercise your
>>knowledge of routing and theCisco IOS, and two, to evaluate your
>judgement.
>>Based on your knowledge and judgement, if this is the best solution, it
>>will
>>be acceptable in the lab. In most cases, static routes are not the best
>>choice, but under some circumstances, they do represent a powerful
>solution.
>>Of course, if the lab instructions state "Create a static route to
>X.X.X.X
>>via null0 and redistribute it in OSPF", I'd do it.
>>
>>Jim
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: "Sandy Thielamay" <sandyt@cndpro.com>
>>To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>>Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2001 1:01 PM
>>Subject: ip route xxxx null0 OSPF IGRP red.
>>
>>
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> I am redistributing OSPF into IGRP with a network of 170.100.0.0 =
>>> variable subnetted. I have an ethernet interface on my ASBR and the
=
>>> subnet is 170.100.42.240 and of course IGRP does not see it.=20
>>>
>>> I see two possible scenarios that can happen...
>>>
>>> Scenario 1-I could be asked to put the ethernet interface into ospf
>and
>>=
>>> redistribute it.
>>> Scenario2- Or the interface is not in the OSPF process.
>>>
>>> Scenario 2 can be easily fixed by redistributing connected subnets
>and
>>a =
>>> route-map filter to allow network 170.100.42.0 only.
>>>
>>> My question is Scenario 1-Can I use the command "ip route
>170.100.42.0
>>=
>>> xxxx null 0" on the exam ? or this is considered static......Is the
=
>>> command "summary-address" suppose to work in this scenario if I have
>it
>>=
>>> in the ospf process.=20
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Sandy T.
>>>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:28:40 GMT-3