From: Jay Chandradas (jachandr@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Feb 05 2001 - 00:51:37 GMT-3
Wen ,
I think u will see the routes( what u have mentioned ) from EIGRP. The
reason .. somebody please correct me ..
The router in which u r doing a mutual redistribution, say R1.. will
examine the major net and the mask configured on he RIP interface. If the
route is part of the same major net as the interface and with a same mask,
RIP will advertise that route. And it its .. different R1 will not
advertise it.. Here in this case all ur nets are majot net 80.0.0.0 and all
the masks are same . The same behavior with OSPF as well.
HIH
Jay.
At 03:37 PM 2/4/2001 -0800, Ya Wen wrote:
>Hi,all:
>
>If I redistribute between a classful and a classless routing protocol,
>for example, RIP V1 and EIGRP, what will happen if I have some
>discontiguous subnets in both routing domain? Will auto-summarization
>still occur in the classful network boundaries? Let's say the boundary
>router is running both RIP v1 and EIGRP with auto summarization enabled,
>mutual redistribution is configured on this router, if I have a
>80.160.1.0/24 subnet in RIP v1 domain, I also got 80.80.2.0/24,
>80.80.1.0/24 and 80.80.3.0/24 subnets in the EIGRP domain, will the RIP
>domain see these three /24 subnets from EIGRP domain or it will only see
>a summarized 80.0.0.0/8 or maybe it will see nothing from EIGRP. I think
>I already knew the answer here, which is RIP will see nothing from
>EIGRP, but I could not explain this result? Why RIP could not see the
>subnets? What if I am running RIP v1 and OSPF? Will that make any
>difference?
>
>Please help clarify!
>
>Thanks a lot!
>
>-Ya
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:28:36 GMT-3