From: David FAHED (dfahed@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Feb 02 2001 - 20:45:32 GMT-3
The better way for the LAB (Because you can't use static) is:
1) Redistribute IGRP on OSPF
2) Show ip ospf database to verify that ospf learned the route 133.2.10.0 as an
external route
3) Use a summary-address 133.2.10.0/24 on ospf process
4) Redistribute ospf on IGRP
Hope this help you!
"Fallon, Bill" wrote:
> Both Routers are using the same 133.2.x.x Network
>
> Router1->s0=133.2.10.1/27 mask: Ospf Area 0)
> |
> s1(IGRP s1=133.2.2.1/24)
> |
> |
> |
> |s0=133.2.2.2/24
> Router2(IGRP)
>
> IGRP Mutual Redistribution with OSPF: In order for Router 2 to ping any and
> all non /24 networks in the OSPF cloud there are only 3 ways I know of that
> this can be accomplished. In particular I am concerned with the Directly
> connected S0 with a /27 mask.
>
> 1) Default network advertisded by Router 1 to Router 2
> 2) IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 on Router 2
> 3) Policy routing--set ip hext hop or default interface)
>
> Even if you try an Area 0 summary for the subnet on this S0 interface, the
> directly connected route will be the one that is used in the Redistribution
> to IGRP because of the Better admin distance on a C route (And IGRP of
> course will ignore this route)
>
> Does any one know of any other way to get Router 2 to ping the /27 interface
> on Router 1 other then the 3 ways I have listed?
>
> Thanks,
> Bill
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:28:34 GMT-3