From: Justin Menga (Justin.Menga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Jan 31 2001 - 08:35:23 GMT-3
Indeed true - you need to use TCP to support Ethernet bridge domains...
Regards,
Justin Menga CCIE #6640 MCSE+I CCSE
WAN Specialist
Computerland New Zealand
PO Box 3631, Auckland
DDI: (+64) 9 360 4864 Mobile: (+64) 25 349 599
mailto: justin.menga@computerland.co.nz
-----Original Message-----
From: Simon Hope [mailto:shope@netsatx.net]
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 11:35 PM
To: Ccielab
Subject: Re: DLSW+ Encapsulation
I thought DLSW with FST and Direct encap only supported token ring attached
endstations, not Ethernet attached endstations. with FST you can have
ethernet in the IP cloud obviously. As your end stations are ethernet
attached then traffic will not be passed. FST also does not support local
ack, so will pass the RIF thru to the remote ring
I remember reading this in Cisco Network Design and Case Studies, see
chapter 8: DLSW Advanced features.
Cheers
Simon
----- Original Message -----
From: "Keith Leonard" <Keith_Leonard@data3.com.au>
To: "Stanford Wong - CNS" <stanford@cns-hawaii.com>
Cc: "Ccielab" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>; <nobody@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 10:13 AM
Subject: Re: DLSW+ Encapsulation
>
> Try putting a 'remote-peer' statement on router1 instead of the
> 'promiscuous' command. Then try some debugs.
>
> Keith
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:27:49 GMT-3