From: Jarrod Mills (jarrod.mills@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Jan 26 2001 - 16:31:29 GMT-3
what do you mean by link them together? If you mean you want traffic from
bridge group 1 on R1 to only goto bridge-group 1 on R2 and vice-versa, you
need additional commands (bgroups, etc) and add the bgroup list number to
the remote peer statement.
HTH
----- Original Message -----
From: "BUI, TIN T (SBCSI)" <tb4565@sbc.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2001 1:05 PM
Subject: multiple dlsw bridges
> Suppose I have bridge group 1 and bridge group 2 on R1 and I have bridge
> group 1 on R2 and I want to link them together via dlsw. Would this be a
> correct config or do I not need dlsw bridge-group 2? thanks
>
> Router 1
> !
> source-bridge ring-group 2000
> dlsw bridge-group 1
> dlsw bridge-group 2
> dlsw local-peer peer-id 150.150.1.1
> dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 150.150.2.1
> !
> interface Loopback0
> ip address 150.150.1.1 255.255.255.0
> !
> interface Ethernet0
> ip address 150.150.30.1 255.255.255.0
> bridge-group 1
> !
> interface ethernet1
> ip address 150.150.31.1 255.255.255.0
> bridge-group 2
>
> bridge 1 protocol dec
> bridge 2 protocol dec
> !
> Router 2:
> !
> source-bridge ring-group 2000
> dlsw local-peer peer-id 150.150.2.1
> dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 150.150.1.1
> dlsw bridge-group 1
> !
> interface Loopback0
> ip address 150.150.2.1 255.255.255.0
> !
> interface Serial0
> ip address 150.150.100.2 255.255.255.0
> !
> interface Ethernet0
> ip address 150.150.40.1 255.255.255.0
> bridge-group 1
> !
> bridge 1 protocol dec
>
> > Tin T. Bui
> > Senior Network Manager
> > CCNP, CNE, MCP
> > Network Management Center
> > SBC Services Inc.
> > 7337 Trade Street, Rm 1110
> > San Diego, Ca 92121
> > Office #: 858-886-4644/858-886-4589
> > Pager #: 858-494-0482
> > Fax #: 858-549-4103
> > Email: tb4565@sbc.com
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:27:44 GMT-3