From: Michael E. Flannagan (mflannag@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Jan 25 2001 - 18:55:38 GMT-3
Yep - it makes perfect sense. They are the max queue depth, max number of
dynamic queues and max number of reservable queues (RSVP), respectively.
------------------------------------------------------------
C i s c o S y s t e m s Michael E. Flannagan
| | Network Consulting Engineer
||| ||| Research Triangle Park, NC
||||||| ||||||| (919) 392-4550
.:|||||||||||:.:|||||||||||:. mflannag@cisco.com
------------------------------------------------------------
On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Murphy, Brennan wrote:
> i know that WFQ is on by default on serial lines with bandwidth less
> than E1 speeds. But does it make sense to find this command
> on an ethernet interface:
>
> fair queue 64 250 0
>
> ???
>
> I browsed around in CCO....couldnt find an answer to this particular
> question.
>
> also, in the interest of conserving space: is there an easy command
> to issue on a router to list TCP sessions flowing across the
> router from hosts to other hosts?
>
> thanks!
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:27:44 GMT-3