From: Michael E. Flannagan (mflannag@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Jan 25 2001 - 18:40:26 GMT-3
I disagree...CAR is the way to go. GTS "shapes" (as the name implies), it
is not a rate-limit.
------------------------------------------------------------
C i s c o S y s t e m s Michael E. Flannagan
| | Network Consulting Engineer
||| ||| Research Triangle Park, NC
||||||| ||||||| (919) 392-4550
.:|||||||||||:.:|||||||||||:. mflannag@cisco.com
------------------------------------------------------------
On Mon, 22 Jan 2001, Desyatnik, Yan wrote:
>
> The simplest solution is to do GTS
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wayne Hu [mailto:wayneccie@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 10:34 AM
> To: Lab Guy; ccie
> Subject: RE: custom queuing
>
> I think you should use CAR
>
> rate-limit input access-group 100 .............
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On
> Behalf Of
> Lab Guy
> Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 9:59 AM
> To: ccie
> Subject: custom queuing
>
>
> Would this limit www traffic to 2.5 meg on my ethernet
> interface?
>
> queue-list 1 protocol ip 1 list 100
> queue-list 1 queue 1 byte-count 2500000
> queue-list 1 default 2
>
> int e0
> custom-queue-list 1
>
> access-list 100 permit tcp any any eq www
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:27:44 GMT-3