From: Michael E. Flannagan (mflannag@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Jan 25 2001 - 18:39:37 GMT-3
For rate limiting traffic, that is correct...CQ will NOT accomplish this.
------------------------------------------------------------
C i s c o S y s t e m s Michael E. Flannagan
| | Network Consulting Engineer
||| ||| Research Triangle Park, NC
||||||| ||||||| (919) 392-4550
.:|||||||||||:.:|||||||||||:. mflannag@cisco.com
------------------------------------------------------------
On Mon, 22 Jan 2001, Wayne Hu wrote:
> I think you should use CAR
>
> rate-limit input access-group 100 .............
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> Lab Guy
> Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 9:59 AM
> To: ccie
> Subject: custom queuing
>
>
> Would this limit www traffic to 2.5 meg on my ethernet
> interface?
>
> queue-list 1 protocol ip 1 list 100
> queue-list 1 queue 1 byte-count 2500000
> queue-list 1 default 2
>
> int e0
> custom-queue-list 1
>
> access-list 100 permit tcp any any eq www
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:27:44 GMT-3