From: frank wells (fwells12@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Jan 22 2001 - 15:34:38 GMT-3
<html><DIV>
<P>Explain your reasoning behind allocating looback addresses first please.&nbs
p; I thought it would be better to allocate them last so that they are the high
est addresses on the routers. That way your RID's wouln't change if you r
eboot etc.<BR><BR></P></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>From: Ronnie Royston <RONNIER@GLOBALDATASYS.COM>
<DIV></DIV>>Reply-To: Ronnie Royston <RONNIER@GLOBALDATASYS.COM>
<DIV></DIV>>To: "'Dave Martin'" <CISCOGUY2000@HOTMAIL.COM>, ccielab@groupstu
dy.com
<DIV></DIV>>Subject: RE: IP allocation matrix question?
<DIV></DIV>>Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 11:19:43 -0600
<DIV></DIV>>
<DIV></DIV>>Yea, I do.
<DIV></DIV>>
<DIV></DIV>>Don't try and get all scientific about it. Even though you've sp
ent alot of
<DIV></DIV>>time mastering the VLSM concept, it's easier to read routing tab
les if you
<DIV></DIV>>keep things as simple as possible - using incrementally higher n
umbers in
<DIV></DIV>>the 3rd octet for example even though you may have /24 /25 /26 /
27, etc. As
<DIV></DIV>>long as the network portion of your addressing is different for
each subnet,
<DIV></DIV>>you won't have any overlapping issues. Also, before you start ty
ping or
<DIV></DIV>>writing, take into account if you are going to use loopbacks and
allocate
<DIV></DIV>>those subnet numbers first. Hope that helps.
<DIV></DIV>>
<DIV></DIV>>-----Original Message-----
<DIV></DIV>>From: Dave Martin [mailto:ciscoguy2000@hotmail.com]
<DIV></DIV>>Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 10:59 PM
<DIV></DIV>>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
<DIV></DIV>>Subject: IP allocation matrix question?
<DIV></DIV>>
<DIV></DIV>>
<DIV></DIV>>Does anyone have any good tips for an IP allocation matrix for t
he lab?
<DIV></DIV>>
<DIV></DIV>>Thanks,
<DIV></DIV>>Dave
<DIV></DIV>>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:27:39 GMT-3