From: Wayne S. Lewis (lewisway@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Jan 17 2001 - 05:34:12 GMT-3
Yes, my Ph.D. was in Abelian Group Theory - how perceptive.
-----Original Message-----
From: Wu Jiang [mailto:wujiang@bj163.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 10:21 PM
To: Wayne S. Lewis
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: connected routes
My major is Probability & Statistics. Yours seems to be Abstract Algebra...
----- Original Message -----
From: "Wayne S. Lewis" <lewisway@hcc.hawaii.edu>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 4:10 PM
Subject: connected routes
>
> I have a general routing question.
>
> When unintentionally redistributing connected network A into a routing
> protocol, say XRP,
>
> (1) in the context of trying to legitimately advertise some other non-XRP
> connected network(s) within XRP,
> (2) where network/interface A is already being advertised explicitly
within
> XRP, and
> (3) for which a filter is not applied to prevent the redistribution of
> 'extraneous' non-XRP directly connected networks such as A,
>
> is this always a problem? Or are some routing protocols able to figure it
> out (use the advertised network as opposed to the inadvertently
> redistributed connected version of the same - like A)?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Wayne
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:27:32 GMT-3